“Companion Species” and Donna Haraway’s Critique of Post-Humanism

Dan Hansong
{"title":"“Companion Species” and Donna Haraway’s Critique of Post-Humanism","authors":"Dan Hansong","doi":"10.47297/WSPCTWSP2515-470205.20200402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“The posthuman”, as a cultural condition brought about by techno revolutions, should be discussed along with animals, which function as “the other” that helps with the configuration of posthuman subjectivity. By regarding human beings, animals and cyborgs as “companion species” in the broad sense, Donna Haraway creates new space for making an alternative critique of posthumanism usually associated with informatics and cybernetics. Haraway’s conception of animal, on the one hand, underscores the relationality between men and animals, which not only challenges the anthropocentric image of animals fostered since the Enlightenment, but stands as a counterpoint to the animal philosophies of Deleuze, Levinas and Derrida. On the other hand, Haraway’s posthuman ethics on animals, though derived from the frontier of modern biosciences, remains utopian when it comes to an on-the-ground practice in the lived world. The difficulties of carrying out Haraway’s animal ethics are manifest in her problematic engagement with Spivak’s postcolonial critique. This essay suggests that we need to perform empathic cross-species imagination which finds its embodiment in the domain of literary text. Only by doing so can we find a path to the so-called “Cosmopolitics” rooted in the corporeal and historical commonality of men and animals.","PeriodicalId":53382,"journal":{"name":"The Bible and Critical Theory","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bible and Critical Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47297/WSPCTWSP2515-470205.20200402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“The posthuman”, as a cultural condition brought about by techno revolutions, should be discussed along with animals, which function as “the other” that helps with the configuration of posthuman subjectivity. By regarding human beings, animals and cyborgs as “companion species” in the broad sense, Donna Haraway creates new space for making an alternative critique of posthumanism usually associated with informatics and cybernetics. Haraway’s conception of animal, on the one hand, underscores the relationality between men and animals, which not only challenges the anthropocentric image of animals fostered since the Enlightenment, but stands as a counterpoint to the animal philosophies of Deleuze, Levinas and Derrida. On the other hand, Haraway’s posthuman ethics on animals, though derived from the frontier of modern biosciences, remains utopian when it comes to an on-the-ground practice in the lived world. The difficulties of carrying out Haraway’s animal ethics are manifest in her problematic engagement with Spivak’s postcolonial critique. This essay suggests that we need to perform empathic cross-species imagination which finds its embodiment in the domain of literary text. Only by doing so can we find a path to the so-called “Cosmopolitics” rooted in the corporeal and historical commonality of men and animals.
“同伴物种”与唐娜·哈拉威对后人文主义的批判
“后人类”作为技术革命带来的一种文化状态,应该与动物一起讨论,动物作为“他者”,有助于后人类主体性的配置。Donna Haraway将人类、动物和电子人视为广义上的“伴侣物种”,为对通常与信息学和控制论相关的后人类主义进行另类批判创造了新的空间。哈拉威的动物观一方面强调了人与动物之间的关系,这不仅挑战了启蒙运动以来形成的以人类为中心的动物形象,而且与德勒兹、列维纳斯和德里达的动物哲学形成了对比。另一方面,哈拉威关于动物的后人类伦理虽然源自现代生物科学的前沿,但在现实世界的实践中仍然是乌托邦式的。哈拉威的动物伦理在她与斯皮瓦克的后殖民批判的有问题的接触中表现得很明显。本文认为,我们需要进行共情的跨物种想象,这种想象在文学文本领域得到体现。只有这样,我们才能找到一条通往所谓“世界政治”的道路,这种“世界政治”植根于人与动物的肉体和历史共性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信