Evaluation of the Quality of Open Public Space in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Gebrechristos Nuriye
{"title":"Evaluation of the Quality of Open Public Space in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia","authors":"Gebrechristos Nuriye","doi":"10.7176/cer/12-10-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urbanization history tells us that the public open space first was observed in Greek where Agora served as central market for the community to assemble, debate, and converse diverse opinions (Madanipour, 2003:194), (Larbi Touaf and Soumia Boutkhil(ed)., 2008). Thus, public spaces are part of urban structure, where space and societies are in the dynamic harmony of historical changes. This research is conducted in selected sub-cities of Addis Ababa. The results have illuminated importance of open public spaces in one hand and disclosed how existing open public spaces are deteriorating. The problem is a manifestation of unplanned development of the city whereby the city has experienced haphazard and organic development. The evaluation of the quality of public open spaces in study area is done in view of internationally recognized standards. Concurrent mixed research method is followed employing qualitative and quantitative research approaches. Sample size was scientifically determined. Data analysis was done using different statistical tools. Study results have shown that significant number of open spaces exist in the city with significant size though their performance is reported unacceptably poor. Certain open spaces were found to be in excellent conditions but inaccessible. Conversely certain public open spaces are found in poor condition but they are openly accessible for public use. Conclusions are drawn from study results and recommendations are specified accordingly. Keywords: Open Public Spaces, Quality, Accessibility DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-10-01 Publication date: October 31 st 2020","PeriodicalId":10219,"journal":{"name":"Civil and environmental research","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and environmental research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/cer/12-10-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Urbanization history tells us that the public open space first was observed in Greek where Agora served as central market for the community to assemble, debate, and converse diverse opinions (Madanipour, 2003:194), (Larbi Touaf and Soumia Boutkhil(ed)., 2008). Thus, public spaces are part of urban structure, where space and societies are in the dynamic harmony of historical changes. This research is conducted in selected sub-cities of Addis Ababa. The results have illuminated importance of open public spaces in one hand and disclosed how existing open public spaces are deteriorating. The problem is a manifestation of unplanned development of the city whereby the city has experienced haphazard and organic development. The evaluation of the quality of public open spaces in study area is done in view of internationally recognized standards. Concurrent mixed research method is followed employing qualitative and quantitative research approaches. Sample size was scientifically determined. Data analysis was done using different statistical tools. Study results have shown that significant number of open spaces exist in the city with significant size though their performance is reported unacceptably poor. Certain open spaces were found to be in excellent conditions but inaccessible. Conversely certain public open spaces are found in poor condition but they are openly accessible for public use. Conclusions are drawn from study results and recommendations are specified accordingly. Keywords: Open Public Spaces, Quality, Accessibility DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-10-01 Publication date: October 31 st 2020
埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴开放公共空间质量评价
城市化的历史告诉我们,公共开放空间最早出现在希腊,在那里,Agora作为社区聚集、辩论和交流不同意见的中心市场(Madanipour, 2003:194), (Larbi Touaf和Soumia Boutkhil(编辑))。, 2008)。因此,公共空间是城市结构的一部分,空间和社会处于历史变迁的动态和谐中。本研究是在亚的斯亚贝巴选定的副城市进行的。研究结果一方面说明了开放公共空间的重要性,另一方面也揭示了现有开放公共空间的恶化情况。这个问题是城市无计划发展的表现,城市经历了偶然和有机的发展。根据国际公认的标准对研究区内的公共开放空间进行质量评估。采用定性研究和定量研究相结合的并行混合研究方法。样本大小是科学确定的。使用不同的统计工具进行数据分析。研究结果表明,城市中存在大量规模可观的开放空间,尽管它们的表现令人难以接受。发现某些开放空间条件很好,但无法进入。相反,某些公共开放空间条件较差,但它们可供公众开放使用。从研究结果中得出结论,并相应地提出建议。关键词:开放公共空间,质量,可达性DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-10-01出版日期:2020年10月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信