Face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation in the middle of the pandemic: patients’ views

Maria Gomes, S. Almeida, S. Souto-Miranda, Guilherme Rodrigues, Alda Sofia Pires De Dias Marques
{"title":"Face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation in the middle of the pandemic: patients’ views","authors":"Maria Gomes, S. Almeida, S. Souto-Miranda, Guilherme Rodrigues, Alda Sofia Pires De Dias Marques","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.oa1190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On-site pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes are currently scarce due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Existing programmes faced major routine changes to ensure safety and continuity of care with unknown impacts on patients. Thus, we explored the impact of such changes in people with chronic respiratory diseases going through PR during the pandemic. A qualitative study was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed per verbatim . A preliminary deductive thematic analysis was performed. 17 patients (7 ILD, 8 COPD and, 2 asthma; 9 males; 63±10 years) were interviewed and 5 themes were identified. Implemented infection prevention and control measures and a closer healthcare professional (HCP)- patient interaction were identified as important factors that contributed to patients’ perception of a safe environment. Reduced social interaction with peers and increased HCP workload and stress were recognised as having a negative impact. PR was perceived as essential, to break social isolation and relieve stress induced by the pandemic, and for patients to feel fitter, more capable, and confident (Fig.1). On-site PR is valued by patients and was perceived safe and beneficial during the pandemic. Careful reflection about maintaining PR programmes closed is recommended. Future studies should also explore the impact of","PeriodicalId":94171,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2021.oa1190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On-site pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes are currently scarce due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Existing programmes faced major routine changes to ensure safety and continuity of care with unknown impacts on patients. Thus, we explored the impact of such changes in people with chronic respiratory diseases going through PR during the pandemic. A qualitative study was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed per verbatim . A preliminary deductive thematic analysis was performed. 17 patients (7 ILD, 8 COPD and, 2 asthma; 9 males; 63±10 years) were interviewed and 5 themes were identified. Implemented infection prevention and control measures and a closer healthcare professional (HCP)- patient interaction were identified as important factors that contributed to patients’ perception of a safe environment. Reduced social interaction with peers and increased HCP workload and stress were recognised as having a negative impact. PR was perceived as essential, to break social isolation and relieve stress induced by the pandemic, and for patients to feel fitter, more capable, and confident (Fig.1). On-site PR is valued by patients and was perceived safe and beneficial during the pandemic. Careful reflection about maintaining PR programmes closed is recommended. Future studies should also explore the impact of
大流行期间面对面的肺部康复:患者的观点
由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,目前现场肺康复规划很少。现有规划面临重大常规变化,以确保护理的安全性和连续性,对患者的影响未知。因此,我们探讨了这种变化对大流行期间经历PR的慢性呼吸道疾病患者的影响。进行了定性研究。半结构化的采访被录音并逐字抄写。进行了初步的演绎主题分析。17例(ILD 7例,COPD 8例,哮喘2例;9男性;(63±10岁),确定了5个主题。实施的感染预防和控制措施以及医护人员与患者之间更密切的互动被认为是影响患者对安全环境感知的重要因素。减少与同伴的社会交往,增加HCP工作量和压力被认为有负面影响。PR被认为是必不可少的,可以打破社会隔离,缓解大流行带来的压力,让患者感觉更健康、更有能力、更自信(图1)。现场公关受到患者的重视,在大流行期间被认为是安全和有益的。建议仔细考虑保持公关项目关闭的问题。未来的研究还应探讨的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信