Was there a shift from Levallois to Still Bay point knapping at Hollow Rock Shelter, South Africa?

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
A. Högberg, M. Lombard
{"title":"Was there a shift from Levallois to Still Bay point knapping at Hollow Rock Shelter, South Africa?","authors":"A. Högberg, M. Lombard","doi":"10.1080/0067270X.2022.2050558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With this contribution we revisit the lithic point assemblage from Hollow Rock Shelter, South Africa. Our objective is to test whether, in addition to its finely retouched Still Bay points, an earlier Levallois-type Mossel Bay point-making tradition may also be represented at the site and, if so, how the two traditions relate to each other. We conducted a fine-grained temporal attribute study that includes point-production strategies, material use and morphometric analyses. We show that, contrary to previous interpretation, Mossel Bay-type points are represented at Hollow Rock Shelter before about 80,000 years ago. Subsequently, the knappers started to make Still Bay points during the later phase, but Levallois-type Mossel Bay points continued to be used throughout the sequence. Variation between the phases lay in the frequencies of point types and material use through time, as well as in subtle changes in morphometric attributes. As a result, we suggest that Levallois point production was part of the inventory of the Still Bay at Hollow Rock Shelter, but has not previously been reported as such. This study adds to an increasing body of work that demonstrates that Still Bay point production in southern Africa was not the abrupt technological phenomenon previously claimed, but our outcomes nevertheless require further testing at sites with better stratigraphic context than that available at Hollow Rock Shelter.","PeriodicalId":45689,"journal":{"name":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Azania-Archaeological Research in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0067270X.2022.2050558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT With this contribution we revisit the lithic point assemblage from Hollow Rock Shelter, South Africa. Our objective is to test whether, in addition to its finely retouched Still Bay points, an earlier Levallois-type Mossel Bay point-making tradition may also be represented at the site and, if so, how the two traditions relate to each other. We conducted a fine-grained temporal attribute study that includes point-production strategies, material use and morphometric analyses. We show that, contrary to previous interpretation, Mossel Bay-type points are represented at Hollow Rock Shelter before about 80,000 years ago. Subsequently, the knappers started to make Still Bay points during the later phase, but Levallois-type Mossel Bay points continued to be used throughout the sequence. Variation between the phases lay in the frequencies of point types and material use through time, as well as in subtle changes in morphometric attributes. As a result, we suggest that Levallois point production was part of the inventory of the Still Bay at Hollow Rock Shelter, but has not previously been reported as such. This study adds to an increasing body of work that demonstrates that Still Bay point production in southern Africa was not the abrupt technological phenomenon previously claimed, but our outcomes nevertheless require further testing at sites with better stratigraphic context than that available at Hollow Rock Shelter.
是否有从勒瓦卢瓦到斯蒂尔湾点的转变?
通过这个贡献,我们重新审视了南非空心岩石庇护所的石器点组合。我们的目的是测试,除了其精心修饰的斯蒂尔湾点,早期的勒瓦卢瓦类型的莫塞尔湾点制作传统是否也可能在现场表现出来,如果是的话,这两种传统是如何相互关联的。我们进行了一项细粒度的时间属性研究,包括点生产策略、材料使用和形态计量分析。我们表明,与之前的解释相反,莫塞尔湾类型的点在大约8万年前就出现在空心岩避难所。随后,在后期阶段,击碎者开始制造斯蒂尔湾点,但在整个序列中,勒瓦卢瓦类型的莫塞尔湾点继续使用。不同阶段之间的差异在于点类型的频率和随时间的材料使用,以及形态计量属性的细微变化。因此,我们认为勒瓦卢瓦点生产是空心岩庇护所斯蒂尔湾库存的一部分,但以前没有这样的报道。这项研究增加了越来越多的工作,证明非洲南部斯蒂尔湾点的生产并不是之前声称的突然的技术现象,但我们的结果仍然需要在具有比空心岩石避难所更好的地层背景的地点进行进一步的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信