Fair Use Infrastructure for Copyright Management Systems

D. Burk, Julie E. Cohen
{"title":"Fair Use Infrastructure for Copyright Management Systems","authors":"D. Burk, Julie E. Cohen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.239731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose to address the displacement of a particular legal rule, the copyright fair use doctrine, by coded copyright management systems (CMS) rule sets. The fair use doctrine serves a variety of purposes in the current copyright system, including alleviating certain types of market failure, mediating between First Amendment principles of freedom of speech and the copyright system's grant of exclusivity, and facilitating bargaining between copyright holders and potential users. CMS technology addresses only one of these purposes: that of avoiding market failure due to comparatively high transaction costs. Current CMS proposals make no provision for addressing other fair use functions. Similarly, although recent legislation concerning CMS affirms the continued viability of fair use in digital media, it makes no provision for access to CMS-protected works. Thus, the access and use rules encoded within CMS potentially displace the carefully-crafted policies of the copyright legal rule, either by prohibiting unauthorized access and use altogether, or by allowing the copyright owner the technological discretion to constrain the degree of fair use. We argue that the social policies of fair use would be better served by a CMS framework that mimics as closely as possible the fair use access paradigm of published print media: low cost, potentially anonymous access exercised at the user's discretion. After reviewing the options for accommodating fair use within the framework of technological protection, we propose the creation of a \"trusted third party\" CMS infrastructure that includes the Library of Congress. We suggest that as a condition of anti-circumvention protection, copyright holders who choose to encrypt their works for public distribution be required to deposit the key with the Library of Congress. Fair users would gain access by requesting the key from the Library or from a private repository within the network, rather than by presenting a \"fair use license\" to the copyright holder. The identities associated with key requests would be kept legally secure, under legislation similar to current protections for library patronage records. Finally, we review the implications of this proposal, cautioning that it is a second-best alternative to unimpeded fair use access.","PeriodicalId":81374,"journal":{"name":"Harvard journal of law & technology","volume":"87 1","pages":"41-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"103","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard journal of law & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.239731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

Abstract

In this paper, we propose to address the displacement of a particular legal rule, the copyright fair use doctrine, by coded copyright management systems (CMS) rule sets. The fair use doctrine serves a variety of purposes in the current copyright system, including alleviating certain types of market failure, mediating between First Amendment principles of freedom of speech and the copyright system's grant of exclusivity, and facilitating bargaining between copyright holders and potential users. CMS technology addresses only one of these purposes: that of avoiding market failure due to comparatively high transaction costs. Current CMS proposals make no provision for addressing other fair use functions. Similarly, although recent legislation concerning CMS affirms the continued viability of fair use in digital media, it makes no provision for access to CMS-protected works. Thus, the access and use rules encoded within CMS potentially displace the carefully-crafted policies of the copyright legal rule, either by prohibiting unauthorized access and use altogether, or by allowing the copyright owner the technological discretion to constrain the degree of fair use. We argue that the social policies of fair use would be better served by a CMS framework that mimics as closely as possible the fair use access paradigm of published print media: low cost, potentially anonymous access exercised at the user's discretion. After reviewing the options for accommodating fair use within the framework of technological protection, we propose the creation of a "trusted third party" CMS infrastructure that includes the Library of Congress. We suggest that as a condition of anti-circumvention protection, copyright holders who choose to encrypt their works for public distribution be required to deposit the key with the Library of Congress. Fair users would gain access by requesting the key from the Library or from a private repository within the network, rather than by presenting a "fair use license" to the copyright holder. The identities associated with key requests would be kept legally secure, under legislation similar to current protections for library patronage records. Finally, we review the implications of this proposal, cautioning that it is a second-best alternative to unimpeded fair use access.
版权管理系统的合理使用基础结构
在本文中,我们建议通过编码版权管理系统(CMS)规则集来解决版权合理使用原则这一特定法律规则的替代问题。合理使用原则在当前的版权制度中有多种用途,包括减轻某些类型的市场失灵,在第一修正案的言论自由原则和版权制度授予的排他性之间进行调解,以及促进版权所有者和潜在用户之间的讨价还价。CMS技术只解决了其中一个目的:避免由于相对较高的交易成本而导致的市场失灵。目前的CMS提案没有规定解决其他合理使用功能。同样,尽管最近有关CMS的立法确认了数字媒体中合理使用的持续可行性,但它没有规定访问受CMS保护的作品。因此,CMS中编码的访问和使用规则可能取代版权法律规则中精心设计的策略,要么完全禁止未经授权的访问和使用,要么允许版权所有者在技术上自由裁量权来限制合理使用的程度。我们认为,合理使用的社会政策将更好地服务于CMS框架,该框架尽可能地模仿出版印刷媒体的合理使用访问范式:低成本,在用户的自由裁量权下行使潜在的匿名访问。在审查了在技术保护框架内容纳合理使用的选择之后,我们建议创建一个包括国会图书馆在内的“可信第三方”CMS基础设施。我们建议,作为反规避保护的一个条件,选择对其作品进行加密以供公开发行的版权所有者应被要求将密钥存放在国会图书馆。公平用户可以通过向库或网络内的私有存储库请求密钥来获得访问权限,而不是向版权所有者提供“合理使用许可”。与关键请求相关的身份将在法律上得到保护,这与目前对图书馆赞助人记录的保护类似。最后,我们回顾了这一建议的含义,并警告说,它是不受阻碍的合理使用访问的次优选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信