Effect of context-based approach on students’ scientific reasoning on heredity concepts

Q4 Social Sciences
Wuleta Ketema Abebe, Solomon Belay Faris, Habtamu Wodaj Tafari
{"title":"Effect of context-based approach on students’ scientific reasoning on heredity concepts","authors":"Wuleta Ketema Abebe, Solomon Belay Faris, Habtamu Wodaj Tafari","doi":"10.29333/pr/13382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the impact of a context-based relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating, and transferring (REACT) strategy on the scientific reasoning (SR) abilities of tenth grade students. A mixed-method approach and convergent embedded experimental design were used. One hundred thirty-one students participated in the study in three groups. REACT strategy of context-based instruction and conventional instruction integrated with context-based activities was used to teach treatment group 1 (TG 1) and treatment group 2 (TG 2) students, respectively. The students in the comparison group (CG) were taught conventional instruction. The data collected using two-tier multiple-choice tests, observation, and semi-structured interviews were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and descriptive analysis. The result showed that there were significant mean score differences between TG 2 and the other two groups in favor of TG 2. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between TG 1 and CG. This implies that when conventional instruction is integrated with a context-based activity, it has a significantly positive effect on students’ SR skills compared to using a context-based REACT strategy or conventional instruction alone.","PeriodicalId":32435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pedagogical Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pedagogical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the impact of a context-based relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating, and transferring (REACT) strategy on the scientific reasoning (SR) abilities of tenth grade students. A mixed-method approach and convergent embedded experimental design were used. One hundred thirty-one students participated in the study in three groups. REACT strategy of context-based instruction and conventional instruction integrated with context-based activities was used to teach treatment group 1 (TG 1) and treatment group 2 (TG 2) students, respectively. The students in the comparison group (CG) were taught conventional instruction. The data collected using two-tier multiple-choice tests, observation, and semi-structured interviews were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and descriptive analysis. The result showed that there were significant mean score differences between TG 2 and the other two groups in favor of TG 2. Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between TG 1 and CG. This implies that when conventional instruction is integrated with a context-based activity, it has a significantly positive effect on students’ SR skills compared to using a context-based REACT strategy or conventional instruction alone.
情境教学法对学生遗传概念科学推理的影响
本研究旨在探讨基于情境的关联、体验、应用、合作和迁移(REACT)策略对十年级学生科学推理能力的影响。采用混合方法和收敛嵌入式实验设计。131名学生分成三组参加了这项研究。实验组1 (TG 1)和实验组2 (TG 2)分别采用情境教学和传统教学结合情境活动的REACT策略进行教学。对照组(CG)采用常规教学。采用两层选择测验、观察和半结构化访谈收集的数据采用单因素方差分析和描述性分析。结果表明,TG 2组与其他两组之间的平均得分有显著差异。然而,TG 1和CG之间没有显著差异。这意味着,当传统教学与基于情境的活动相结合时,与使用基于情境的REACT策略或单独使用传统教学相比,它对学生的SR技能有显著的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信