Bangla Version of Lymphedema Life Impact Scale Version 2: Reliability and Validity

Mohammed Emran, Md Israt Hasan, Md Nazmul Alam, Neelufar Rahman, Md Zulfikar Ali
{"title":"Bangla Version of Lymphedema Life Impact Scale Version 2: Reliability and Validity","authors":"Mohammed Emran, Md Israt Hasan, Md Nazmul Alam, Neelufar Rahman, Md Zulfikar Ali","doi":"10.3329/kyamcj.v13i4.65053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of disease-specific scales would be more valuable for the evaluation of the effects of lymphedema. To manage accordingly, and maintain the optimum quality of life of lymphedema patient, a validated outcome measure is helpful.Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of Bangla Version of Lymphedema Life Impact Scale Version 2 (B-LLIS V2).Materials and Methods: A structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. B-LLIS V2 reliability and validity were conducted on 52 lymphedema patients. The reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. Its validity was assessed by comparing the B-LLIS V2 with other scales implying Pearson’s correlation.Results: Internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92 for total score and 0.79, 0.82, 0.80 and 0.78 for physical, psychosocial, functional, and infection respectively. The calculated overall tool score in Intra-class correlation co-efficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability was 0.94 and among subscales, the scores were 0.92, 0.95, 0.91 and 0.93 for physical, Psychosocial, functional, and infection respectively, which signified substantial reliability. The overall values of Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the construct validity were 0.91, 0.78 and 0.86 against reference standard Bengali SF-36 Health Survey, Bangla version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and Bangla Start Back Screening Tool, and they all were statistically significant.Conclusions: B-LLIS V2 is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of impairment due to lymphedema. \nKYAMC Journal Vol. 13, No. 04, January 2023: 198-203","PeriodicalId":17948,"journal":{"name":"KYAMC Journal","volume":"144 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KYAMC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/kyamcj.v13i4.65053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of disease-specific scales would be more valuable for the evaluation of the effects of lymphedema. To manage accordingly, and maintain the optimum quality of life of lymphedema patient, a validated outcome measure is helpful.Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of Bangla Version of Lymphedema Life Impact Scale Version 2 (B-LLIS V2).Materials and Methods: A structured process that included translation, verification, compromise assessment, reverse translation, feedback, and final correction. B-LLIS V2 reliability and validity were conducted on 52 lymphedema patients. The reliability was evaluated by performing internal consistency and test–retest analyses. Its validity was assessed by comparing the B-LLIS V2 with other scales implying Pearson’s correlation.Results: Internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92 for total score and 0.79, 0.82, 0.80 and 0.78 for physical, psychosocial, functional, and infection respectively. The calculated overall tool score in Intra-class correlation co-efficient (ICC) for test-retest reliability was 0.94 and among subscales, the scores were 0.92, 0.95, 0.91 and 0.93 for physical, Psychosocial, functional, and infection respectively, which signified substantial reliability. The overall values of Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the construct validity were 0.91, 0.78 and 0.86 against reference standard Bengali SF-36 Health Survey, Bangla version of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and Bangla Start Back Screening Tool, and they all were statistically significant.Conclusions: B-LLIS V2 is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of impairment due to lymphedema. KYAMC Journal Vol. 13, No. 04, January 2023: 198-203
孟加拉版淋巴水肿寿命影响量表第2版:信度和效度
背景:使用疾病特异性量表对评价淋巴水肿的影响更有价值。为了对淋巴水肿患者进行相应的管理,并维持最佳的生活质量,一个有效的结果测量是有帮助的。目的:探讨孟加拉版淋巴水肿生活影响量表第2版(B-LLIS V2)的信度和效度。材料和方法:一个结构化的过程,包括翻译、验证、妥协评估、反向翻译、反馈和最终更正。对52例淋巴水肿患者进行B-LLIS V2信度和效度分析。通过进行内部一致性和重测分析来评估信度。通过比较B-LLIS V2与其他量表的相关性来评估其有效性。结果:总分与Cronbach 's alpha的内部一致性为0.92,生理、社会心理、功能和感染的内部一致性分别为0.79、0.82、0.80和0.78。在类内相关系数(ICC)中,重测信度的计算总体工具得分为0.94,在亚量表中,身体、社会心理、功能和感染的得分分别为0.92、0.95、0.91和0.93,具有较高的信度。对照参考标准孟加拉SF-36健康调查、孟加拉版波士顿腕管问卷和孟加拉Start Back筛查工具,构建效度的Pearson相关系数总体值分别为0.91、0.78和0.86,均具有统计学意义。结论:B-LLIS V2是一种有效、可靠的评估淋巴水肿损害的工具。KYAMC学报第13卷第4期,2023年1月:198-203
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信