Switching between External and Internal Attention in Hippocampal Networks

Craig Poskanzer, Mariam Aly
{"title":"Switching between External and Internal Attention in Hippocampal Networks","authors":"Craig Poskanzer, Mariam Aly","doi":"10.1101/2022.12.20.521285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Everyday experience requires processing external signals from the world around us and internal information retrieved from memory. To do both, the brain must fluctuate between states that are optimized for external versus internal attention. Here, we focus on the hippocampus as a region that may serve at the interface between these forms of attention and ask how it switches between prioritizing sensory signals from the external world versus internal signals related to memories and thoughts. Pharmacological, computational, and animal studies have identified input from the cholinergic basal forebrain as important for biasing the hippocampus toward processing external information, whereas complementary research suggests the dorsal attention network (DAN) may aid in allocating attentional resources toward accessing internal information. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the basal forebrain and DAN drive the hippocampus toward external and internal attention, respectively. We used data from 29 human participants (17 female) who completed two attention tasks during fMRI. One task (memory-guided) required proportionally more internal attention, and proportionally less external attention, than the other (explicitly instructed). We discovered that background functional connectivity between the basal forebrain and hippocampus was stronger during the explicitly instructed versus memory-guided task. In contrast, DAN–hippocampus background connectivity was stronger during the memory-guided versus explicitly instructed task. Finally, the strength of DAN–hippocampus background connectivity was correlated with performance on the memory-guided but not explicitly instructed task. Together, these results provide evidence that the basal forebrain and DAN may modulate the hippocampus to switch between external and internal attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How does the brain balance the need to pay attention to internal thoughts and external sensations? We focused on the human hippocampus, a region that may serve at the interface between internal and external attention, and asked how its functional connectivity varies based on attentional states. The hippocampus was more strongly coupled with the cholinergic basal forebrain when attentional states were guided by the external world rather than retrieved memories. This pattern flipped for functional connectivity between the hippocampus and dorsal attention network, which was higher for attention tasks that were guided by memory rather than external cues. Together, these findings show that distinct networks in the brain may modulate the hippocampus to switch between external and internal attention.","PeriodicalId":22786,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"28 1","pages":"6538 - 6552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.20.521285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Everyday experience requires processing external signals from the world around us and internal information retrieved from memory. To do both, the brain must fluctuate between states that are optimized for external versus internal attention. Here, we focus on the hippocampus as a region that may serve at the interface between these forms of attention and ask how it switches between prioritizing sensory signals from the external world versus internal signals related to memories and thoughts. Pharmacological, computational, and animal studies have identified input from the cholinergic basal forebrain as important for biasing the hippocampus toward processing external information, whereas complementary research suggests the dorsal attention network (DAN) may aid in allocating attentional resources toward accessing internal information. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the basal forebrain and DAN drive the hippocampus toward external and internal attention, respectively. We used data from 29 human participants (17 female) who completed two attention tasks during fMRI. One task (memory-guided) required proportionally more internal attention, and proportionally less external attention, than the other (explicitly instructed). We discovered that background functional connectivity between the basal forebrain and hippocampus was stronger during the explicitly instructed versus memory-guided task. In contrast, DAN–hippocampus background connectivity was stronger during the memory-guided versus explicitly instructed task. Finally, the strength of DAN–hippocampus background connectivity was correlated with performance on the memory-guided but not explicitly instructed task. Together, these results provide evidence that the basal forebrain and DAN may modulate the hippocampus to switch between external and internal attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How does the brain balance the need to pay attention to internal thoughts and external sensations? We focused on the human hippocampus, a region that may serve at the interface between internal and external attention, and asked how its functional connectivity varies based on attentional states. The hippocampus was more strongly coupled with the cholinergic basal forebrain when attentional states were guided by the external world rather than retrieved memories. This pattern flipped for functional connectivity between the hippocampus and dorsal attention network, which was higher for attention tasks that were guided by memory rather than external cues. Together, these findings show that distinct networks in the brain may modulate the hippocampus to switch between external and internal attention.
海马体网络内外注意的转换
日常经验需要处理来自我们周围世界的外部信号和从记忆中获取的内部信息。要做到这两点,大脑必须在最适合外部和内部注意力的状态之间波动。在这里,我们把重点放在海马体上,它可能是这些形式的注意力之间的接口,并询问它是如何在优先考虑来自外部世界的感觉信号和与记忆和思想相关的内部信号之间切换的。药理学、计算和动物研究已经确定来自胆碱能基底前脑的输入对于海马偏向于处理外部信息是重要的,而补充研究表明背侧注意网络(DAN)可能有助于分配注意力资源以获取内部信息。因此,我们测试了基底前脑和DAN分别驱动海马体向外部和内部注意的假设。我们使用了29名人类参与者(17名女性)的数据,他们在fMRI期间完成了两个注意力任务。一项任务(记忆引导)比另一项任务(明确指示)需要更多的内部注意力,而更少的外部注意力。我们发现基底前脑和海马体之间的背景功能连接在明确指示任务中比在记忆引导任务中更强。相比之下,记忆引导任务与明确指示任务相比,丹-海马体背景连通性更强。最后,丹-海马体背景连接的强度与记忆引导而非明确指示任务的表现相关。总之,这些结果提供了证据,表明基底前脑和DAN可能调节海马体在外部和内部注意之间切换。大脑是如何平衡对内在思想和外在感觉的关注的?我们关注的是人的海马体,一个可能在内部和外部注意力之间起作用的区域,并询问其功能连接如何根据注意力状态而变化。当注意力状态是由外部世界而不是被检索到的记忆引导时,海马体与胆碱能基底前脑的耦合更强。这种模式在海马体和背侧注意网络之间的功能连接上发生了翻转,在由记忆而不是外部线索引导的注意任务中,背侧注意网络的功能连接更高。总之,这些发现表明,大脑中不同的网络可能调节海马体在外部和内部注意力之间切换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信