A Comparative Study Between Frayer Model And Concept Mapping Strategy to Enhance Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition

Acuity Pub Date : 2020-01-10 DOI:10.35974/acuity.v5i1.2221
N. Panjaitan, Hana Monica Sihotang
{"title":"A Comparative Study Between Frayer Model And Concept Mapping Strategy to Enhance Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition","authors":"N. Panjaitan, Hana Monica Sihotang","doi":"10.35974/acuity.v5i1.2221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis study intends to find out what is the initial knowledge of the students before they were treated using Frayer Model and Concept Mapping Strategy, ascertain of the significant difference between these two teaching strategies, and to know the responses of the students after they were taught using Frayer Model and Concept Mapping Strategy are the aims of this research. This is a quantitative study with comparative design to know the students’ vocabulary acquisition test. The research instrument of this study is pre-and-post-test. This study was conducted among eleventh grader students at SMAN 1 Parongpong. The results of this study showed that the initial score for both respondents are quite similar with the score for FM group which is 30.50 and for CMS group which is 33.40. It is also known that there is a significant difference in students’ vocabulary acquisition between students who are taught with Frayer Model and those who are taught with Concept Mapping Strategy showed by the result of the mean differences from both groups are 0.000 < 0.05. The questionnaire’s result also supports that both teaching strategies are eligible to be applied in teaching active and passive voice construction with the score for FM class which is 55% and for the CMS class which is 80%, it can be categorized as “Good”. It implies that the implementation of Frayer Model and Concept Mapping Strategy enhances student’s vocabulary acquisition. \n  \nKeywords: Language Proficiency, Vocabulary Acquisition, Frayer Model, Concept Mapping Strategy","PeriodicalId":33744,"journal":{"name":"Acuity","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acuity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v5i1.2221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This study intends to find out what is the initial knowledge of the students before they were treated using Frayer Model and Concept Mapping Strategy, ascertain of the significant difference between these two teaching strategies, and to know the responses of the students after they were taught using Frayer Model and Concept Mapping Strategy are the aims of this research. This is a quantitative study with comparative design to know the students’ vocabulary acquisition test. The research instrument of this study is pre-and-post-test. This study was conducted among eleventh grader students at SMAN 1 Parongpong. The results of this study showed that the initial score for both respondents are quite similar with the score for FM group which is 30.50 and for CMS group which is 33.40. It is also known that there is a significant difference in students’ vocabulary acquisition between students who are taught with Frayer Model and those who are taught with Concept Mapping Strategy showed by the result of the mean differences from both groups are 0.000 < 0.05. The questionnaire’s result also supports that both teaching strategies are eligible to be applied in teaching active and passive voice construction with the score for FM class which is 55% and for the CMS class which is 80%, it can be categorized as “Good”. It implies that the implementation of Frayer Model and Concept Mapping Strategy enhances student’s vocabulary acquisition.   Keywords: Language Proficiency, Vocabulary Acquisition, Frayer Model, Concept Mapping Strategy
Frayer模型与概念映射策略促进学生词汇习得的比较研究
本研究旨在了解学生在使用Frayer模型和概念映射策略之前的初始知识是什么,确定两种教学策略之间的显著差异,了解学生在使用Frayer模型和概念映射策略后的反应是本研究的目的。这是一项采用比较设计的定量研究来了解学生词汇习得测试。本研究的研究工具为前后测试。本研究以巴龙邦第一中学的高二学生为研究对象。本研究结果显示,两组被调查者的初始得分与FM组的30.50分和CMS组的33.40分非常接近。我们还知道,使用Frayer模型教学的学生与使用概念映射策略教学的学生在词汇习得方面存在显著差异,两组的平均差异为0.000 < 0.05。问卷调查的结果也支持两种教学策略都可以应用于主动和被动语态的教学,FM班的得分为55%,CMS班的得分为80%,可以归类为“好”。这表明Frayer模型和概念映射策略的实施促进了学生的词汇习得。关键词:语言能力,词汇习得,Frayer模型,概念映射策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信