Avoiding Repeated Attempts at Tracheal Intubation: Can Videolaryngoscopes Be the Answer?

T. Asai
{"title":"Avoiding Repeated Attempts at Tracheal Intubation: Can Videolaryngoscopes Be the Answer?","authors":"T. Asai","doi":"10.1097/01.sa.0000513244.79834.b3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tracheal intubation is a common practice. But multiple attempts can cause airway obstruction and ensuing complications. Guidelines have strongly advised against making multiple tracheal intubation attempts. Many techniques have been described to improve the chances of successful intubation with traditional laryngoscopes (Macintosh and Miller). However, the rate of difficulty has not been significantly reduced. With the modern technological advancements, devices such as video laryngoscopes, fiberoptic bronchoscopes, supraglottic airways (as a conduit for tracheal intubation), lighted stylets, and optical stylets offer alternate options. Aziz et al developed a survey on alternate options used in instanceswhere the conventional methods such as laryngoscope had failed. The authors wanted to retrospectively ascertain the success rates of intubation using these modern devices. A total number of 1427 cases were reviewed. It was observed that video laryngoscopes had the highest success rate (92%) when compared with supraglottic airways (78%), fiberoptic bronchoscope (78%), lighted stylets (77%), and optical stylets (67%). However, because this study was retrospective, selection bias could not be ruled out, and definitive conclusion should not be drawn. Although video","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000513244.79834.b3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Tracheal intubation is a common practice. But multiple attempts can cause airway obstruction and ensuing complications. Guidelines have strongly advised against making multiple tracheal intubation attempts. Many techniques have been described to improve the chances of successful intubation with traditional laryngoscopes (Macintosh and Miller). However, the rate of difficulty has not been significantly reduced. With the modern technological advancements, devices such as video laryngoscopes, fiberoptic bronchoscopes, supraglottic airways (as a conduit for tracheal intubation), lighted stylets, and optical stylets offer alternate options. Aziz et al developed a survey on alternate options used in instanceswhere the conventional methods such as laryngoscope had failed. The authors wanted to retrospectively ascertain the success rates of intubation using these modern devices. A total number of 1427 cases were reviewed. It was observed that video laryngoscopes had the highest success rate (92%) when compared with supraglottic airways (78%), fiberoptic bronchoscope (78%), lighted stylets (77%), and optical stylets (67%). However, because this study was retrospective, selection bias could not be ruled out, and definitive conclusion should not be drawn. Although video
避免气管插管的重复尝试:视频喉镜能解决问题吗?
气管插管是一种常见的做法。但多次尝试会导致气道阻塞和随之而来的并发症。指南强烈建议不要尝试多次气管插管。许多技术已经被描述来提高用传统喉镜插管成功的机会(Macintosh和Miller)。然而,难度并没有显著降低。随着现代技术的进步,诸如视频喉镜、纤维支气管镜、声门上气道(作为气管插管的导管)、灯光导管和光学导管等设备提供了替代选择。Aziz等人开展了一项调查,在喉镜等常规方法失败的情况下使用替代方法。作者想回顾性地确定使用这些现代设备插管的成功率。共审查了1427个案件。与声门上气道(78%)、纤维支气管镜(78%)、灯光插管(77%)和光学插管(67%)相比,视频喉镜的成功率最高(92%)。然而,由于本研究是回顾性的,不能排除选择偏倚,不能得出明确的结论。虽然视频
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信