American black bear den-site selection and characteristics in an urban environment

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY
Ursus Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.2192/URSUS-D-17-00004.2
Toryn L. J. Schafer, S. Breck, S. Baruch‐Mordo, D. Lewis, K. R. Wilson, J. Mao, Thomas L. Day
{"title":"American black bear den-site selection and characteristics in an urban environment","authors":"Toryn L. J. Schafer, S. Breck, S. Baruch‐Mordo, D. Lewis, K. R. Wilson, J. Mao, Thomas L. Day","doi":"10.2192/URSUS-D-17-00004.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Selection of den sites is a crucial aspect of American black bear (Ursus americanus) life history. High-quality dens provide thermal insulation, protection from disturbance, suitable environment for parturition and cub development, and proximity to available forage upon emergence. Black bears are increasingly coexisting with people in human-dominated landscapes; however, little is known about whether urban environments influence characteristics of dens and den site selection. Our objective was to determine the effect of housing density (a proxy for human activity and availability of anthropogenic resources) on selection of den sites in years of good and poor natural forage. We additionally compared size, shape, and location of dens of males and females to describe den characteristics and explore whether differences existed between males and females. We revisited 34 den locations detected during a 6-year (2005–2010) urban black bear study in Aspen, Colorado, USA, and measured den entrance and den volume. We fit a conditional logistic regression model using a resource selection function framework to determine the importance of housing density and other landscape variables (elevation, slope, aspect, and vegetation type) associated with den site selection. Slope was the best predictor of den site selection and there was no relationship between den selection and housing density, indicating that black bears were neither avoiding nor seeking urban areas for denning. Dens were smaller for females ( = 3.30 m3, SE = 1.94, n = 22) than for males ( = 7.56 m3, SE = 3.31, n = 8), supporting the idea that females have greater constraints in den characteristics, possibly related to cub development and security from predation or because females generally are smaller than males.","PeriodicalId":49393,"journal":{"name":"Ursus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ursus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-17-00004.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Selection of den sites is a crucial aspect of American black bear (Ursus americanus) life history. High-quality dens provide thermal insulation, protection from disturbance, suitable environment for parturition and cub development, and proximity to available forage upon emergence. Black bears are increasingly coexisting with people in human-dominated landscapes; however, little is known about whether urban environments influence characteristics of dens and den site selection. Our objective was to determine the effect of housing density (a proxy for human activity and availability of anthropogenic resources) on selection of den sites in years of good and poor natural forage. We additionally compared size, shape, and location of dens of males and females to describe den characteristics and explore whether differences existed between males and females. We revisited 34 den locations detected during a 6-year (2005–2010) urban black bear study in Aspen, Colorado, USA, and measured den entrance and den volume. We fit a conditional logistic regression model using a resource selection function framework to determine the importance of housing density and other landscape variables (elevation, slope, aspect, and vegetation type) associated with den site selection. Slope was the best predictor of den site selection and there was no relationship between den selection and housing density, indicating that black bears were neither avoiding nor seeking urban areas for denning. Dens were smaller for females ( = 3.30 m3, SE = 1.94, n = 22) than for males ( = 7.56 m3, SE = 3.31, n = 8), supporting the idea that females have greater constraints in den characteristics, possibly related to cub development and security from predation or because females generally are smaller than males.
城市环境下美国黑熊窝址的选择与特征
穴址的选择是美洲黑熊生活史的一个重要方面。高质量的洞穴提供隔热,保护免受干扰,适合分娩和幼崽发育的环境,并且在出现时接近可用的饲料。黑熊越来越多地在人类主导的景观中与人类共存;然而,关于城市环境是否影响洞穴特征和洞穴选址,人们知之甚少。我们的目标是确定房屋密度(人类活动和人为资源可用性的代表)在自然饲料质量好和质量差的年份对洞穴地点选择的影响。此外,我们还比较了雄性和雌性洞穴的大小、形状和位置,以描述洞穴特征,并探讨雄性和雌性之间是否存在差异。我们重新考察了美国科罗拉多州阿斯彭市6年(2005-2010年)城市黑熊研究中发现的34个洞穴位置,并测量了洞穴入口和洞穴体积。我们使用资源选择函数框架拟合条件逻辑回归模型,以确定住房密度和其他与洞穴选址相关的景观变量(海拔、坡度、坡向和植被类型)的重要性。坡度是熊穴选择的最佳预测因子,而熊穴选择与生境密度之间没有关系,说明熊穴既不躲避也不寻找城市区域。雌鼠的洞穴(= 3.30 m3, SE = 1.94, n = 22)小于雄鼠(= 7.56 m3, SE = 3.31, n = 8),这支持了雌性在洞穴特征方面受到更大约束的观点,可能与幼崽发育和捕食安全有关,或者因为雌性通常比雄性小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ursus
Ursus 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ursus includes a variety of articles on all aspects of bear management and research worldwide. Original manuscripts are welcome. In addition to manuscripts reporting original research, submissions may be based on thoughtful review and synthesis of previously-reported information, innovative philosophies and opinions, and public policy or legal aspects of wildlife conservation. Notes of general interest are also welcome. Invited manuscripts will be clearly identified, but will still be subject to peer review. All manuscripts must be in English. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed, and subject to rigorous editorial standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信