Best Practices in Diversifying Political Science

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Melissa R. Michelson, Betina Cutaia Wilkinson
{"title":"Best Practices in Diversifying Political Science","authors":"Melissa R. Michelson, Betina Cutaia Wilkinson","doi":"10.1017/s1049096522000804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of bias are pervasive and persistent throughout academia, including in political science, and these problems have been documented extensively (Fraga, Givens, and Pinderhughes 2011; Lavariega Monforti 2012; LavariegaMonforti andMichelson 2008, 2020; McClain et al. 2016; Thomas and Hollenshead 2001). Firstperson perspectives on these challenges and institutional racism have been shared by Alexander-Floyd (2015), SinclairChapman (2015), and Smooth (2016), to name only a few. Individuals from historically excluded groups, especially women of color, have been tokenized by their departments and institutions and asked to assume extra, uncompensated service tasks (Simien and Wallace 2022). They feel invisible, are the subject of microaggressions, and report a sense of not belonging to departments that tend to be dominated by white men (Ghosh and Wang 2022). This rich literature of previous work also documents best practices for institutions and departments to adopt to ensure that they are achieving their diversity and inclusion goals. Yet, lack of implementation of these recommendations persists. After reviewing and summarizing best practices in transforming campus climates, hiring, and retention, this article addresses the persistent gap between institutional knowledge of what should be done and the lack of action among most political science departments.","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096522000804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of bias are pervasive and persistent throughout academia, including in political science, and these problems have been documented extensively (Fraga, Givens, and Pinderhughes 2011; Lavariega Monforti 2012; LavariegaMonforti andMichelson 2008, 2020; McClain et al. 2016; Thomas and Hollenshead 2001). Firstperson perspectives on these challenges and institutional racism have been shared by Alexander-Floyd (2015), SinclairChapman (2015), and Smooth (2016), to name only a few. Individuals from historically excluded groups, especially women of color, have been tokenized by their departments and institutions and asked to assume extra, uncompensated service tasks (Simien and Wallace 2022). They feel invisible, are the subject of microaggressions, and report a sense of not belonging to departments that tend to be dominated by white men (Ghosh and Wang 2022). This rich literature of previous work also documents best practices for institutions and departments to adopt to ensure that they are achieving their diversity and inclusion goals. Yet, lack of implementation of these recommendations persists. After reviewing and summarizing best practices in transforming campus climates, hiring, and retention, this article addresses the persistent gap between institutional knowledge of what should be done and the lack of action among most political science departments.
政治科学多元化的最佳实践
种族主义、性别歧视、同性恋恐惧症和其他形式的偏见在学术界普遍存在,包括在政治科学中,这些问题已经被广泛记录(Fraga, Givens, and Pinderhughes 2011;Lavariega Monforti 2012;LavariegaMonforti andMichelson 2008, 2020;McClain et al. 2016;Thomas and Hollenshead 2001)。亚历山大-弗洛伊德(2015)、辛克莱-查普曼(2015)和斯Smooth(2016)等人都以第一人称的视角分享了这些挑战和制度性种族主义。来自历史上被排斥的群体的个人,尤其是有色人种的女性,已经被他们的部门和机构标记化,并被要求承担额外的、无偿的服务任务(Simien和Wallace 2022)。她们感到被忽视,是微侵犯的对象,并报告说不属于往往由白人男性主导的部门(Ghosh和Wang 2022)。这份丰富的以往工作文献也记录了机构和部门采用的最佳做法,以确保它们实现其多样性和包容性目标。然而,这些建议仍然没有得到执行。在回顾和总结了改变校园气候、招聘和保留的最佳实践之后,本文解决了大多数政治科学部门对应该做什么的制度性知识与缺乏行动之间的持续差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ps-Political Science & Politics
Ps-Political Science & Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: PS: Political Science & Politics provides critical analyses of contemporary political phenomena and is the journal of record for the discipline of political science reporting on research, teaching, and professional development. PS, begun in 1968, is the only quarterly professional news and commentary journal in the field and is the prime source of information on political scientists" achievements and professional concerns. PS: Political Science & Politics is sold ONLY as part of a joint subscription with American Political Science Review and Perspectives on Politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信