On the Efficiency of the Information Networks in Social Media

Mahmoudreza Babaei, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz, I. Valera, K. Gummadi, M. Gomez-Rodriguez
{"title":"On the Efficiency of the Information Networks in Social Media","authors":"Mahmoudreza Babaei, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz, I. Valera, K. Gummadi, M. Gomez-Rodriguez","doi":"10.1145/2835776.2835826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media sites are information marketplaces, where users produce and consume a wide variety of information and ideas. In these sites, users typically choose their information sources, which in turn determine what specific information they receive, how much information they receive and how quickly this information is shown to them. In this context, a natural question that arises is how efficient are social media users at selecting their information sources. In this work, we propose a computational framework to quantify users' efficiency at selecting information sources. Our framework is based on the assumption that the goal of users is to acquire a set of unique pieces of information. To quantify user's efficiency, we ask if the user could have acquired the same pieces of information from another set of sources more efficiently. We define three different notions of efficiency -- link, in-flow, and delay -- corresponding to the number of sources the user follows, the amount of (redundant) information she acquires and the delay with which she receives the information. Our definitions of efficiency are general and applicable to any social media system with an underlying in- formation network, in which every user follows others to receive the information they produce. In our experiments, we measure the efficiency of Twitter users at acquiring different types of information. We find that Twitter users exhibit sub-optimal efficiency across the three notions of efficiency, although they tend to be more efficient at acquiring non- popular pieces of information than they are at acquiring popular pieces of information. We then show that this lack of efficiency is a consequence of the triadic closure mechanism by which users typically discover and follow other users in social media. Thus, our study reveals a tradeoff between the efficiency and discoverability of information sources. Finally, we develop a heuristic algorithm that enables users to be significantly more efficient at acquiring the same unique pieces of information.","PeriodicalId":20567,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2835776.2835826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Social media sites are information marketplaces, where users produce and consume a wide variety of information and ideas. In these sites, users typically choose their information sources, which in turn determine what specific information they receive, how much information they receive and how quickly this information is shown to them. In this context, a natural question that arises is how efficient are social media users at selecting their information sources. In this work, we propose a computational framework to quantify users' efficiency at selecting information sources. Our framework is based on the assumption that the goal of users is to acquire a set of unique pieces of information. To quantify user's efficiency, we ask if the user could have acquired the same pieces of information from another set of sources more efficiently. We define three different notions of efficiency -- link, in-flow, and delay -- corresponding to the number of sources the user follows, the amount of (redundant) information she acquires and the delay with which she receives the information. Our definitions of efficiency are general and applicable to any social media system with an underlying in- formation network, in which every user follows others to receive the information they produce. In our experiments, we measure the efficiency of Twitter users at acquiring different types of information. We find that Twitter users exhibit sub-optimal efficiency across the three notions of efficiency, although they tend to be more efficient at acquiring non- popular pieces of information than they are at acquiring popular pieces of information. We then show that this lack of efficiency is a consequence of the triadic closure mechanism by which users typically discover and follow other users in social media. Thus, our study reveals a tradeoff between the efficiency and discoverability of information sources. Finally, we develop a heuristic algorithm that enables users to be significantly more efficient at acquiring the same unique pieces of information.
论社交媒体中信息网络的效率
社交媒体网站是信息市场,用户在这里生产和消费各种各样的信息和想法。在这些站点中,用户通常选择他们的信息源,这反过来又决定了他们接收的特定信息、接收的信息量以及这些信息显示给他们的速度。在这种情况下,一个自然出现的问题是,社交媒体用户选择信息来源的效率有多高。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个计算框架来量化用户选择信息源的效率。我们的框架基于这样的假设:用户的目标是获取一组唯一的信息。为了量化用户的效率,我们询问用户是否可以更有效地从另一组来源获取相同的信息。我们定义了三种不同的效率概念——链接、内流和延迟——对应于用户遵循的源的数量、她获得的(冗余)信息的数量以及她接收信息的延迟。我们对效率的定义是通用的,适用于任何具有底层信息网络的社交媒体系统,在这个网络中,每个用户都跟随他人来接收他们产生的信息。在我们的实验中,我们测量了Twitter用户获取不同类型信息的效率。我们发现,Twitter用户在三个效率概念中都表现出次优效率,尽管他们在获取非流行信息方面往往比获取流行信息更有效。然后我们表明,这种效率的缺乏是三合一关闭机制的结果,用户通常通过这种机制在社交媒体上发现并关注其他用户。因此,我们的研究揭示了信息源的效率和可发现性之间的权衡。最后,我们开发了一种启发式算法,使用户能够更有效地获取相同的唯一信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信