Evaluation of a novel anaerobic co-digestion system for disposal of dead swine and manure: An important tool in animal production

IF 1.2 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
K. Bes, M. C. Brisola, Regiane B. Crecencio, D. Bitner, A. Frigo, L. Rampazzo, G. A. Faria, D. N. Araújo, A. S. Silva, L. M. Stefani
{"title":"Evaluation of a novel anaerobic co-digestion system for disposal of dead swine and manure: An important tool in animal production","authors":"K. Bes, M. C. Brisola, Regiane B. Crecencio, D. Bitner, A. Frigo, L. Rampazzo, G. A. Faria, D. N. Araújo, A. S. Silva, L. M. Stefani","doi":"10.30486/IJROWA.2020.1886668.1016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The anaerobic digester for dead animals is the most eco-friendly and cost-effective way to dispose of this waste. The aim of this study was to evaluate the removal efficiency of organic matter and pathogenic microorganisms by an anaerobic co-digestion of whole dead animals and manure, both of swine origin. Methods Two test digesters coated with geomembrane were used. Samples were obtained from a private pig farm with 2000 sows in Southern Brazil from April to June of 2017. The analyses were performed in triplicate, at six treatment points and physicochemical and microbiological analyses were performed to evaluate the efficiency of the anaerobic co-digester system. Results We found the efficiency in the removal of chemical oxygen demand (87.88%), biological oxygen demand (83.57%) and total solids (75%), accorded with levels proposed in Resolution 430/2011 of the Brazilian National Environment Council. Furthermore, macro- and micronutrient values also accorded with the environmental parameters proposed by Brazilian legislation. Based on the total nitrogen (2222.00 mg L-1) and environmental critical phosphorus values (333.30 mg dm-³), a subsequent agronomic evaluation is suggested prior to the release of this effluent into the soil. The absence of Salmonella spp. and helminth eggs reinforced the notion of suitability of the system for the treatment of dead animals. Total coliform counts and E. coli counts were within the expected standards. Conclusion Treatment of dead animals and effluents using an anaerobic digestion process was efficient, suggesting that it could replace other methods such as composting and incineration.","PeriodicalId":14373,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30486/IJROWA.2020.1886668.1016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The anaerobic digester for dead animals is the most eco-friendly and cost-effective way to dispose of this waste. The aim of this study was to evaluate the removal efficiency of organic matter and pathogenic microorganisms by an anaerobic co-digestion of whole dead animals and manure, both of swine origin. Methods Two test digesters coated with geomembrane were used. Samples were obtained from a private pig farm with 2000 sows in Southern Brazil from April to June of 2017. The analyses were performed in triplicate, at six treatment points and physicochemical and microbiological analyses were performed to evaluate the efficiency of the anaerobic co-digester system. Results We found the efficiency in the removal of chemical oxygen demand (87.88%), biological oxygen demand (83.57%) and total solids (75%), accorded with levels proposed in Resolution 430/2011 of the Brazilian National Environment Council. Furthermore, macro- and micronutrient values also accorded with the environmental parameters proposed by Brazilian legislation. Based on the total nitrogen (2222.00 mg L-1) and environmental critical phosphorus values (333.30 mg dm-³), a subsequent agronomic evaluation is suggested prior to the release of this effluent into the soil. The absence of Salmonella spp. and helminth eggs reinforced the notion of suitability of the system for the treatment of dead animals. Total coliform counts and E. coli counts were within the expected standards. Conclusion Treatment of dead animals and effluents using an anaerobic digestion process was efficient, suggesting that it could replace other methods such as composting and incineration.
一种处理死猪和粪便的新型厌氧共消化系统的评价:动物生产中的重要工具
目的建立动物尸体厌氧消化池是处理动物尸体最环保、最经济的方法。本研究的目的是评价厌氧共消化全死动物和猪粪对有机物和病原微生物的去除效率。方法采用土工膜包覆两个试验消化池。样本于2017年4月至6月从巴西南部一个拥有2000头母猪的私人养猪场获得。在六个处理点进行了三次分析,并进行了物理化学和微生物分析,以评估厌氧共消化系统的效率。结果化学需氧量(87.88%)、生物需氧量(83.57%)和总固体(75%)的去除率符合巴西国家环境委员会第430/2011号决议提出的水平。此外,宏观和微量营养素值也符合巴西立法提出的环境参数。根据总氮(2222.00 mg L-1)和环境临界磷值(333.30 mg dm-³),建议在将废水排放到土壤中之前进行后续农艺评估。沙门氏菌和蠕虫卵的缺失强化了该系统处理死亡动物的适用性。总大肠菌群计数和大肠杆菌计数均在预期标准内。结论厌氧消化处理动物尸体及污水是一种有效的处理方法,可替代堆肥、焚烧等处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
26.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture is an open access journal that publishes high-quality solicited and unsolicited articles, in all areas of Recycling of organic waste including: -Solid waste reuse in agriculture -Waste water reuse in agriculture -Utilization of organic wastes: composting -Ways to reduce, reuse and recycle organic waste -Social and economic impact of reduction, reuse and recycling of organic waste in agriculture -Methods to raise the public awareness of recycling and reuse of organic waste in agriculture -Organic waste utilization in animal and poultry nutrition -Urban food waste composting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信