{"title":"The Chicago Wheat Futures Market: Recent Problems in Historical Perspective","authors":"R. W. Gray, A. E. Peck","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.135592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In March of 1979 the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered trading terminated in the expiring March wheat futures contract at Chicago, which had three trading days remaining. The CFTC has authority, under the 1974 Act, \"to direct the contract market to take such action as, in the Commission's judgment, is necessary to maintain or restore orderly trading in, or liquidation of, any futures contract .... whenever it has reason to believe that an emergency exists\" (CFTC, 1976). The Chicago Board of Trade obtained an injunction against the CFTC order, allowing the March contract to trade out, and providing at least transitory comfort to those who feared that this unprecedented intervebtion might establish a precedent. The court, in granting the injunction, said \"this is a case where a government agency has overreached itself. It has been called upon to justify its actions, and instead of attempting to do so has chosen to stand behind a rule of law which ... it misconceives\" (Board of Trade, 1979). But the Appeals Court subsequently ruled (upheld by the Supreme Court) that the CFTC order was not subject to judicial review. The CFTC had presented a list of seven market factors upon which the order had been based (CFTC, 1979a);","PeriodicalId":81281,"journal":{"name":"Food Research Institute studies (Stanford, Calif. : 1975)","volume":"67 1","pages":"89-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research Institute studies (Stanford, Calif. : 1975)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.135592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46
Abstract
In March of 1979 the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered trading terminated in the expiring March wheat futures contract at Chicago, which had three trading days remaining. The CFTC has authority, under the 1974 Act, "to direct the contract market to take such action as, in the Commission's judgment, is necessary to maintain or restore orderly trading in, or liquidation of, any futures contract .... whenever it has reason to believe that an emergency exists" (CFTC, 1976). The Chicago Board of Trade obtained an injunction against the CFTC order, allowing the March contract to trade out, and providing at least transitory comfort to those who feared that this unprecedented intervebtion might establish a precedent. The court, in granting the injunction, said "this is a case where a government agency has overreached itself. It has been called upon to justify its actions, and instead of attempting to do so has chosen to stand behind a rule of law which ... it misconceives" (Board of Trade, 1979). But the Appeals Court subsequently ruled (upheld by the Supreme Court) that the CFTC order was not subject to judicial review. The CFTC had presented a list of seven market factors upon which the order had been based (CFTC, 1979a);
1979年3月,商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)下令终止芝加哥3月小麦期货合约的交易,当时合约还剩下三个交易日。根据1974年法案,CFTC有权“指导合约市场采取委员会认为必要的行动,以维持或恢复任何期货合约的有序交易或清算....”只要它有理由相信存在紧急情况”(CFTC, 1976)。芝加哥期货交易所(Chicago Board of Trade)获得了针对CFTC命令的禁令,允许3月份的合约进行场外交易,这至少让那些担心这一史无前例的干预可能会开创先例的人暂时得到了安慰。法院在颁发禁令时表示,“这是一个政府机构越权的案例。”它被要求为其行动辩护,而不是试图这样做,而是选择支持法治…它误解了”(贸易委员会,1979年)。但上诉法院随后裁定(由最高法院支持),CFTC的命令不受司法审查。商品期货交易委员会提出了一份清单,列出了该命令所依据的七个市场因素(商品期货交易委员会,1979a);