The Chicago Wheat Futures Market: Recent Problems in Historical Perspective

R. W. Gray, A. E. Peck
{"title":"The Chicago Wheat Futures Market: Recent Problems in Historical Perspective","authors":"R. W. Gray, A. E. Peck","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.135592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In March of 1979 the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered trading terminated in the expiring March wheat futures contract at Chicago, which had three trading days remaining. The CFTC has authority, under the 1974 Act, \"to direct the contract market to take such action as, in the Commission's judgment, is necessary to maintain or restore orderly trading in, or liquidation of, any futures contract .... whenever it has reason to believe that an emergency exists\" (CFTC, 1976). The Chicago Board of Trade obtained an injunction against the CFTC order, allowing the March contract to trade out, and providing at least transitory comfort to those who feared that this unprecedented intervebtion might establish a precedent. The court, in granting the injunction, said \"this is a case where a government agency has overreached itself. It has been called upon to justify its actions, and instead of attempting to do so has chosen to stand behind a rule of law which ... it misconceives\" (Board of Trade, 1979). But the Appeals Court subsequently ruled (upheld by the Supreme Court) that the CFTC order was not subject to judicial review. The CFTC had presented a list of seven market factors upon which the order had been based (CFTC, 1979a);","PeriodicalId":81281,"journal":{"name":"Food Research Institute studies (Stanford, Calif. : 1975)","volume":"67 1","pages":"89-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research Institute studies (Stanford, Calif. : 1975)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.135592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

In March of 1979 the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered trading terminated in the expiring March wheat futures contract at Chicago, which had three trading days remaining. The CFTC has authority, under the 1974 Act, "to direct the contract market to take such action as, in the Commission's judgment, is necessary to maintain or restore orderly trading in, or liquidation of, any futures contract .... whenever it has reason to believe that an emergency exists" (CFTC, 1976). The Chicago Board of Trade obtained an injunction against the CFTC order, allowing the March contract to trade out, and providing at least transitory comfort to those who feared that this unprecedented intervebtion might establish a precedent. The court, in granting the injunction, said "this is a case where a government agency has overreached itself. It has been called upon to justify its actions, and instead of attempting to do so has chosen to stand behind a rule of law which ... it misconceives" (Board of Trade, 1979). But the Appeals Court subsequently ruled (upheld by the Supreme Court) that the CFTC order was not subject to judicial review. The CFTC had presented a list of seven market factors upon which the order had been based (CFTC, 1979a);
芝加哥小麦期货市场:历史视角下的近期问题
1979年3月,商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)下令终止芝加哥3月小麦期货合约的交易,当时合约还剩下三个交易日。根据1974年法案,CFTC有权“指导合约市场采取委员会认为必要的行动,以维持或恢复任何期货合约的有序交易或清算....”只要它有理由相信存在紧急情况”(CFTC, 1976)。芝加哥期货交易所(Chicago Board of Trade)获得了针对CFTC命令的禁令,允许3月份的合约进行场外交易,这至少让那些担心这一史无前例的干预可能会开创先例的人暂时得到了安慰。法院在颁发禁令时表示,“这是一个政府机构越权的案例。”它被要求为其行动辩护,而不是试图这样做,而是选择支持法治…它误解了”(贸易委员会,1979年)。但上诉法院随后裁定(由最高法院支持),CFTC的命令不受司法审查。商品期货交易委员会提出了一份清单,列出了该命令所依据的七个市场因素(商品期货交易委员会,1979a);
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书