The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī?

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
U. M. Kılavuz
{"title":"The Muʿtazilism of al-Zamakhsharī: A Bahshamī or a Ḥusaynī?","authors":"U. M. Kılavuz","doi":"10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Al-Zamakhsharī’s Muʿtazilī identity is undisputed, aside from a few isolated assertions or inquiries to the contrary. In fact, alongside historical records that depict him as a loyal Muʿtazilī and even a propagandist for his madhhab, the opinions he expressed and the approaches he employed in his works serve as evidence for this claim. The two Muʿtazilī schools that operated during his time in the Muslim world, in particular in his own region of Khwārazm, were the Bahshamiyyah and the Ḥusayniyyah. Considering this fact, in terms of his theological identity, it could be asserted either that he is a member of one of the Bahshamī or Ḥusaynī schools or that he positions himself “in search of a broadly based, catholic Muʿtazilism” instead of taking a clear stand. This study, while providing partial evidence for the latter claim, argues that his Ḥusaynī identity is rather evident from his ideological stance and opinions.","PeriodicalId":40354,"journal":{"name":"Ilahiyat Studies-A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilahiyat Studies-A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2021.122.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Al-Zamakhsharī’s Muʿtazilī identity is undisputed, aside from a few isolated assertions or inquiries to the contrary. In fact, alongside historical records that depict him as a loyal Muʿtazilī and even a propagandist for his madhhab, the opinions he expressed and the approaches he employed in his works serve as evidence for this claim. The two Muʿtazilī schools that operated during his time in the Muslim world, in particular in his own region of Khwārazm, were the Bahshamiyyah and the Ḥusayniyyah. Considering this fact, in terms of his theological identity, it could be asserted either that he is a member of one of the Bahshamī or Ḥusaynī schools or that he positions himself “in search of a broadly based, catholic Muʿtazilism” instead of taking a clear stand. This study, while providing partial evidence for the latter claim, argues that his Ḥusaynī identity is rather evident from his ideological stance and opinions.
al- zamakhshari的Mu - tazilism:是bahshami还是Ḥusaynī?
al - zamakhshari的Mu - tazili的身份是无可争议的,除了一些孤立的断言或相反的询问。事实上,除了历史记录将他描绘成一个忠诚的Mu - tazili,甚至是他的madhhab的宣传者之外,他在作品中表达的观点和使用的方法都是这一说法的证据。在他的时代,在穆斯林世界,特别是在他自己的Khwārazm地区,有两所Mu - tazilyi学派,分别是Bahshamiyyah和Ḥusayniyyah。考虑到这一事实,就他的神学身份而言,可以断言他是bahshami或Ḥusaynī学派之一的成员,或者他将自己定位为“寻找广泛的,天主教的Mu - tazilism”,而不是采取明确的立场。本研究虽然为后一种说法提供了部分证据,但认为从他的意识形态立场和观点来看,他的Ḥusaynī身份是相当明显的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信