Effect of Ankle Bracing Vs. Taping on Vertical Jump Performance

Kyle A Burnett, L. Brown, R. Kersey, K. K. Tsang
{"title":"Effect of Ankle Bracing Vs. Taping on Vertical Jump Performance","authors":"Kyle A Burnett, L. Brown, R. Kersey, K. K. Tsang","doi":"10.4172/2324-9080.1000187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effect of Ankle Bracing Vs. Taping on Vertical Jump Performance \nThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of ankle taping and bracing on ankle plantar and dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and vertical jump performance. Twenty males with no history of current or recent lower extremity injury were recruited to participate. Subjects randomly performed under three conditions on three different days, (T) taping, (B) bracing, and (C) control. Ankle ROM was assessed at four time periods each day: pre-condition, post-condition, post-warm-up and post-jump. Following the condition application, subjects completed a dynamic warm-up and then performed three maximal vertical jumps on a force plate. Relative ground reaction force (relGRF) and relative impact force (relIF) were measured by the force plate, while vertical jump height (VJH) was estimated using the time-in-air equation. Ankle dorsi-plantar flexion ROM was measured using a standard goniometer and expressed in total degrees. The same certified athletic trainer performed all tape and brace applications, as well as all measurements. ANOVA for ROM revealed no differences at pre-condition, but control was significantly greater than T and B at all other time points. Vertical jump performance was not different between conditions. Although T and B ROM was acutely decreased and then increased over time, values were still less than C. Therefore, within the limits of this study, prophylactic taping and bracing may be used to provide ankle support without compromising vertical jump performance.","PeriodicalId":90574,"journal":{"name":"Journal of athletic enhancement","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of athletic enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9080.1000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Effect of Ankle Bracing Vs. Taping on Vertical Jump Performance The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of ankle taping and bracing on ankle plantar and dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and vertical jump performance. Twenty males with no history of current or recent lower extremity injury were recruited to participate. Subjects randomly performed under three conditions on three different days, (T) taping, (B) bracing, and (C) control. Ankle ROM was assessed at four time periods each day: pre-condition, post-condition, post-warm-up and post-jump. Following the condition application, subjects completed a dynamic warm-up and then performed three maximal vertical jumps on a force plate. Relative ground reaction force (relGRF) and relative impact force (relIF) were measured by the force plate, while vertical jump height (VJH) was estimated using the time-in-air equation. Ankle dorsi-plantar flexion ROM was measured using a standard goniometer and expressed in total degrees. The same certified athletic trainer performed all tape and brace applications, as well as all measurements. ANOVA for ROM revealed no differences at pre-condition, but control was significantly greater than T and B at all other time points. Vertical jump performance was not different between conditions. Although T and B ROM was acutely decreased and then increased over time, values were still less than C. Therefore, within the limits of this study, prophylactic taping and bracing may be used to provide ankle support without compromising vertical jump performance.
踝关节支撑与绑带对垂直起跳性能的影响
踝关节绑带与绑带对垂直起跳性能的影响本研究的目的是探讨绑带和绑带对踝关节足底和背屈活动范围(ROM)和垂直起跳性能的影响。招募了20名没有当前或近期下肢损伤史的男性参与研究。受试者在三个不同的日子随机进行三种情况下的实验,(T)贴带,(B)支具,(C)对照。每天在四个时间段评估踝关节ROM:训练前、训练后、热身后和跳跃后。条件应用后,受试者完成动态热身,然后在测力板上进行三次最大垂直跳跃。利用测力板测量相对地面反作用力(relGRF)和相对冲击力(relIF),利用在空中时间方程估算垂直起跳高度(VJH)。使用标准测角仪测量踝关节背-足底屈曲ROM,并用总度数表示。同一认证的运动教练执行所有胶带和支架应用,以及所有的测量。对ROM的方差分析显示,在先决条件下没有差异,但在所有其他时间点,对照显著大于T和B。不同条件下的垂直跳跃性能没有差异。虽然T和B ROM随着时间的推移急剧下降,然后增加,但值仍然小于c。因此,在本研究的范围内,可以使用预防性胶布和支具来提供踝关节支撑,而不影响垂直跳跃性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书