Impact of simulation training on decision to delivery interval in cord prolapse

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
G. Gallagher, Alison Griffin, Sharon Clipperton, S. Janssens
{"title":"Impact of simulation training on decision to delivery interval in cord prolapse","authors":"G. Gallagher, Alison Griffin, Sharon Clipperton, S. Janssens","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Umbilical cord prolapse is a rare obstetric emergency requiring rapid coordination of a multidisciplinary team to effect urgent delivery. The decision to delivery interval (DDI) is a marker of quality of teamwork. Multidisciplinary team simulation-based training can be used to improve clinical and teamwork performance. Aim To assess the DDI for cord prolapse before and after the introduction of simulation-based training at a quaternary maternity unit in Australia. Method A retrospective, observational cohort study comparing the DDI before and after the introduction of simulation-based training activities. The general linear model was used to estimate the association between DDI and simulation training while adjusting for potential confounders including model of care (public or private) and time of birth (regular or after hours). Results After the introduction of simulation training, mean DDI decreased by 4.1 min (difference −4.1, 95% CI −6.2 to −1.9), after adjustment for confounding factors. Despite this, there was no difference in selected neonatal outcomes including Apgar score at 5 min and arterial cord pH. Conclusions The introduction of simulation-based training was associated with a decrease in the DDI in the setting of cord prolapse.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"266 1","pages":"543 - 547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background Umbilical cord prolapse is a rare obstetric emergency requiring rapid coordination of a multidisciplinary team to effect urgent delivery. The decision to delivery interval (DDI) is a marker of quality of teamwork. Multidisciplinary team simulation-based training can be used to improve clinical and teamwork performance. Aim To assess the DDI for cord prolapse before and after the introduction of simulation-based training at a quaternary maternity unit in Australia. Method A retrospective, observational cohort study comparing the DDI before and after the introduction of simulation-based training activities. The general linear model was used to estimate the association between DDI and simulation training while adjusting for potential confounders including model of care (public or private) and time of birth (regular or after hours). Results After the introduction of simulation training, mean DDI decreased by 4.1 min (difference −4.1, 95% CI −6.2 to −1.9), after adjustment for confounding factors. Despite this, there was no difference in selected neonatal outcomes including Apgar score at 5 min and arterial cord pH. Conclusions The introduction of simulation-based training was associated with a decrease in the DDI in the setting of cord prolapse.
模拟训练对脐带脱垂分娩间隔决策的影响
背景脐带脱垂是一种罕见的产科急诊,需要多学科团队快速协调以实现紧急分娩。决策交付间隔(DDI)是团队合作质量的标志。多学科团队模拟训练可用于提高临床和团队绩效。目的评估在澳大利亚一家第四产科单位引入模拟培训前后脐带脱垂的DDI。方法采用回顾性、观察性队列研究,比较引入模拟训练活动前后的DDI。一般线性模型用于估计DDI和模拟训练之间的关联,同时调整潜在的混杂因素,包括护理模式(公共或私人)和出生时间(常规或下班后)。结果引入模拟训练后,校正混杂因素后,平均DDI下降4.1 min(差异为- 4.1,95% CI为- 6.2至- 1.9)。尽管如此,包括5分钟时Apgar评分和动脉脐带ph在内的选定新生儿结局没有差异。结论:在脐带脱垂的情况下,引入基于模拟的训练与DDI的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信