Aeroacoustic formulations for confined flows based on incompressible flow data

IF 1 3区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ACOUSTICS
Paul Maurerlehner, S. Schoder, J. Tieber, Clemens Freidhager, H. Steiner, G. Brenn, Karl-Heinz Schäfer, A. Ennemoser, M. Kaltenbacher
{"title":"Aeroacoustic formulations for confined flows based on incompressible flow data","authors":"Paul Maurerlehner, S. Schoder, J. Tieber, Clemens Freidhager, H. Steiner, G. Brenn, Karl-Heinz Schäfer, A. Ennemoser, M. Kaltenbacher","doi":"10.1051/aacus/2022041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hybrid aeroacoustic approach is an efficient way to address the issue of the disparity of scales in Computational AeroAcoustics (CAA) at low Mach numbers. In the present paper, three wave equations governing propagation of flow-induced sound of low Mach number flows, namely the Perturbed Convective Wave Equation (PCWE), Ribner’s Dilatation (RIB) equation, and Lighthill’s wave equation, are applied using the Finite Element Method (FEM). An airflow through a circular pipe with a half-moon-shaped orifice at three operating flow speeds is considered, where validation data from measurements on a dedicated test rig is available. An extensive analysis of the flow field is provided based on the results of the incompressible flow simulation. The resulting acoustic source terms are investigated, and the relevant source term contributions are determined. The results of the acoustic propagation simulations revealed that the PCWE and RIB are best suited for the present task. The overall deviation of the predicted pressure spectra from the measured mean values amounted to 2.26 and 2.13 times the standard deviation of the measurement compared to 3.55 for Lighthill’s wave equation. Besides reliably predicting the flow-induced sound, the numerical procedure of source term computation is straightforward for PCWE and RIB, where the source term contributions, shown to be relevant, solely consist of time derivatives of the incompressible pressure. In contrast, the Lighthill source term involves spatial derivatives and, thus, is strongly dependent on the spatial resolution and the numerical method actually used for approximating these terms.","PeriodicalId":48486,"journal":{"name":"Acta Acustica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Acustica","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2022041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The hybrid aeroacoustic approach is an efficient way to address the issue of the disparity of scales in Computational AeroAcoustics (CAA) at low Mach numbers. In the present paper, three wave equations governing propagation of flow-induced sound of low Mach number flows, namely the Perturbed Convective Wave Equation (PCWE), Ribner’s Dilatation (RIB) equation, and Lighthill’s wave equation, are applied using the Finite Element Method (FEM). An airflow through a circular pipe with a half-moon-shaped orifice at three operating flow speeds is considered, where validation data from measurements on a dedicated test rig is available. An extensive analysis of the flow field is provided based on the results of the incompressible flow simulation. The resulting acoustic source terms are investigated, and the relevant source term contributions are determined. The results of the acoustic propagation simulations revealed that the PCWE and RIB are best suited for the present task. The overall deviation of the predicted pressure spectra from the measured mean values amounted to 2.26 and 2.13 times the standard deviation of the measurement compared to 3.55 for Lighthill’s wave equation. Besides reliably predicting the flow-induced sound, the numerical procedure of source term computation is straightforward for PCWE and RIB, where the source term contributions, shown to be relevant, solely consist of time derivatives of the incompressible pressure. In contrast, the Lighthill source term involves spatial derivatives and, thus, is strongly dependent on the spatial resolution and the numerical method actually used for approximating these terms.
基于不可压缩流动数据的受限流动气动声学公式
混合气动声学方法是解决低马赫数计算气动声学(CAA)中尺度差异问题的有效方法。本文采用有限元法对低马赫数流动中控制流声传播的三个波动方程,即摄动对流波动方程(PCWE)、里伯纳膨胀方程(RIB)和莱特希尔波动方程(Lighthill’s波动方程)进行了分析。考虑在三种工作流速下通过带有半月形孔的圆形管道的气流,其中可获得专用测试平台测量的验证数据。基于不可压缩流动模拟的结果,对流场进行了广泛的分析。研究了由此产生的声源项,并确定了相关的声源项贡献。声学传播模拟结果表明,PCWE和RIB最适合本课题。预测压力谱与测量平均值的总体偏差分别为测量标准差的2.26和2.13倍,而Lighthill波动方程的标准差为3.55倍。除了可靠地预测流动声外,对于PCWE和RIB,源项计算的数值过程也很简单,其中源项贡献显示出相关性,仅由不可压缩压力的时间导数组成。相比之下,Lighthill源项涉及空间导数,因此,强烈依赖于空间分辨率和实际用于近似这些项的数值方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Acustica
Acta Acustica ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Acustica, the Journal of the European Acoustics Association (EAA). After the publication of its Journal Acta Acustica from 1993 to 1995, the EAA published Acta Acustica united with Acustica from 1996 to 2019. From 2020, the EAA decided to publish a journal in full Open Access. See Article Processing charges. Acta Acustica reports on original scientific research in acoustics and on engineering applications. The journal considers review papers, scientific papers, technical and applied papers, short communications, letters to the editor. From time to time, special issues and review articles are also published. For book reviews or doctoral thesis abstracts, please contact the Editor in Chief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信