Too many hands: a bureaucratic screenwriting for the Czech silent national epic Svatý Václav (St. Wenceslas) (1930)

IF 0.3 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
M. Kos
{"title":"Too many hands: a bureaucratic screenwriting for the Czech silent national epic Svatý Václav (St. Wenceslas) (1930)","authors":"M. Kos","doi":"10.1080/2040350X.2021.1889771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the Czech screenwriting practice vis-à-vis state-subsidised cinema. It focuses on the silent national epic drama St. Wenceslas (Svatý Václav, 1930) and sheds light on the forms of bureaucratic interventions throughout the formalised writing process. Drawing on Ian W. Macdonald’s concepts of screen idea and screen idea work group, the paper seeks to explain a collective dynamic and deals with the official historiography issue. I argue that academics had frequently altered the screen idea to suit their historical interpretation. Since this was enabled by their prominence in the collective, the article examines the hierarchy of power in the decision-making process and the forms of collaboration, competition and negotiation. In so doing, it helps us to rethink the screenwriting practice by explaining the functions of the screenwriting contest jury and the impact of supervisory voices delineating textual boundaries. The outlined screenwriters’ solutions then illustrate both the creativity in telling the well-known story within the limits and the pragmatic decrease in artistic ambitions.","PeriodicalId":52267,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","volume":"10 1","pages":"121 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2021.1889771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the Czech screenwriting practice vis-à-vis state-subsidised cinema. It focuses on the silent national epic drama St. Wenceslas (Svatý Václav, 1930) and sheds light on the forms of bureaucratic interventions throughout the formalised writing process. Drawing on Ian W. Macdonald’s concepts of screen idea and screen idea work group, the paper seeks to explain a collective dynamic and deals with the official historiography issue. I argue that academics had frequently altered the screen idea to suit their historical interpretation. Since this was enabled by their prominence in the collective, the article examines the hierarchy of power in the decision-making process and the forms of collaboration, competition and negotiation. In so doing, it helps us to rethink the screenwriting practice by explaining the functions of the screenwriting contest jury and the impact of supervisory voices delineating textual boundaries. The outlined screenwriters’ solutions then illustrate both the creativity in telling the well-known story within the limits and the pragmatic decrease in artistic ambitions.
太多的手:捷克无声民族史诗Svatý Václav的官僚主义编剧(圣瓦茨拉夫)(1930)
本文考察了捷克在-à-vis国家资助电影院的编剧实践。它侧重于无声的民族史诗戏剧圣瓦茨拉夫(Svatý Václav, 1930),并阐明了官僚干预的形式在整个正式写作过程。本文借鉴麦克唐纳的屏风观念和屏风观念工作组的概念,试图解释一种集体动力,并处理正史问题。我认为,学者们经常改变屏幕的概念,以适应他们的历史解释。由于这是由于他们在集体中的突出地位,本文研究了决策过程中的权力等级以及合作、竞争和谈判的形式。在此过程中,通过解释编剧大赛评审团的功能和监管声音划定文本边界的影响,有助于我们重新思考编剧实践。然后,列出的编剧的解决方案说明了在限制范围内讲述众所周知的故事的创造力和艺术野心的务实减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Eastern European Cinema
Studies in Eastern European Cinema Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信