Teachers' Misunderstanding The Concept Of Inclusive Education

T. Sanagi
{"title":"Teachers' Misunderstanding The Concept Of Inclusive Education","authors":"T. Sanagi","doi":"10.19030/CIER.V9I3.9705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers' misunderstanding the concept of inclusive education will not lead to good practices, rather make an exclusive environment for pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools. This study clarified teachers' attitudes towards the image of inclusive education with conjoint analysis and cluster analysis. The participants for this study were 182 teachers who were from both mainstream schools and special schools. Their image about inclusive education was mainly dependent upon the organization of group and size of a group. The subfile summary of the conjoint analysis indicated that the teacher's views of inclusive education as images of \"expanding school environment to include a child\", withdrawal to \"resource room\", \"small groups\", and \"a pupil with disability in a mainstream group.\" On the other hand, images of \"repudiation of segregated learning opportunities\", \"homogeneous group\", \"a large size group\", and \"various attributes in a group\" were perceived as \"non-inclusive.\" The author has divided the participants into two groups by cluster analysis. The factors in dividing were discussed as not depend on their teaching experience nor school type, but local school environment - such as enrollment ratio of foreign pupils.","PeriodicalId":91062,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","volume":"36 1","pages":"103-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/CIER.V9I3.9705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Teachers' misunderstanding the concept of inclusive education will not lead to good practices, rather make an exclusive environment for pupils with special educational needs in mainstream schools. This study clarified teachers' attitudes towards the image of inclusive education with conjoint analysis and cluster analysis. The participants for this study were 182 teachers who were from both mainstream schools and special schools. Their image about inclusive education was mainly dependent upon the organization of group and size of a group. The subfile summary of the conjoint analysis indicated that the teacher's views of inclusive education as images of "expanding school environment to include a child", withdrawal to "resource room", "small groups", and "a pupil with disability in a mainstream group." On the other hand, images of "repudiation of segregated learning opportunities", "homogeneous group", "a large size group", and "various attributes in a group" were perceived as "non-inclusive." The author has divided the participants into two groups by cluster analysis. The factors in dividing were discussed as not depend on their teaching experience nor school type, but local school environment - such as enrollment ratio of foreign pupils.
教师对全纳教育概念的误解
教师对全纳教育概念的误解,不仅不会产生良好的实践,反而会使主流学校为有特殊教育需要的学生提供一个排他性的环境。本研究采用联合分析和聚类分析的方法,明确了教师对全纳教育形象的态度。本研究以182名来自普通学校和特殊学校的教师为研究对象。他们对全纳教育的形象主要取决于群体的组织和群体的规模。联合分析的子文件总结表明,教师对全纳教育的看法是“扩大学校环境以容纳一个孩子”、“退缩到资源室”、“小团体”和“主流群体中的残疾学生”的形象。另一方面,“拒绝隔离学习机会”、“同质群体”、“大群体”和“群体中的各种属性”的形象被认为是“非包容性”。作者通过聚类分析将参与者分为两组。讨论了划分的因素不取决于他们的教学经验或学校类型,而是当地学校环境-例如外国学生的入学率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信