EC3-Compatible Methods for Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Structures

Sofia Antonodimitraki, P. Thanopoulos, I. Vayas
{"title":"EC3-Compatible Methods for Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Structures","authors":"Sofia Antonodimitraki, P. Thanopoulos, I. Vayas","doi":"10.3390/modelling2040030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The behaviour of steel structures is affected by two nonlinearities—the geometric and material nonlinearity—and by the unavoidable presence of imperfections. To evaluate the ultimate capacity of a structure, these effects should be taken into consideration during the design process, either explicitly in the analysis or implicitly through the verification checks. In this context, Eurocode 3 provides several design approaches of different complexity and accuracy. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches are discussed. Five different methods in conformity with the Eurocode provisions are applied for the design of four moment resisting steel frames of varying slenderness. The influence of nonlinearities and imperfections in respect to the slenderness of the structure is illustrated. The examined methods are compared in terms of the predicted ultimate capacity and their efficiency is assessed against the most accurate between them, i.e., an advanced geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis. It is shown that considerable differences arise between the methods. Nevertheless, except for the commonly used 2nd order analysis followed by cross-section verifications, the remaining methods are mostly on the safe side.","PeriodicalId":89310,"journal":{"name":"WIT transactions on modelling and simulation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT transactions on modelling and simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling2040030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behaviour of steel structures is affected by two nonlinearities—the geometric and material nonlinearity—and by the unavoidable presence of imperfections. To evaluate the ultimate capacity of a structure, these effects should be taken into consideration during the design process, either explicitly in the analysis or implicitly through the verification checks. In this context, Eurocode 3 provides several design approaches of different complexity and accuracy. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches are discussed. Five different methods in conformity with the Eurocode provisions are applied for the design of four moment resisting steel frames of varying slenderness. The influence of nonlinearities and imperfections in respect to the slenderness of the structure is illustrated. The examined methods are compared in terms of the predicted ultimate capacity and their efficiency is assessed against the most accurate between them, i.e., an advanced geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis. It is shown that considerable differences arise between the methods. Nevertheless, except for the commonly used 2nd order analysis followed by cross-section verifications, the remaining methods are mostly on the safe side.
钢框架结构分析与设计的ec3兼容方法
钢结构的性能受到几何非线性和材料非线性两种非线性以及不可避免的缺陷的影响。为了评估结构的极限承载力,在设计过程中应考虑这些影响,无论是在分析中明确考虑,还是在验证检查中隐含考虑。在这种情况下,欧洲规范3提供了几种不同复杂性和精度的设计方法。讨论了这些方法的优缺点。采用符合欧洲规范规定的五种不同方法对不同长细比的四榀抗弯矩钢框架进行了设计。说明了非线性和缺陷对结构长细度的影响。根据预测的极限承载力对所研究的方法进行了比较,并对它们之间最准确的效率进行了评估,即先进的几何和材料非线性分析。结果表明,这些方法之间存在相当大的差异。然而,除了常用的二阶分析和截面验证外,其他方法大多是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信