The Qualitative Review of Human Security in South Africa: A Four Levels Analysis

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
S. Zondi
{"title":"The Qualitative Review of Human Security in South Africa: A Four Levels Analysis","authors":"S. Zondi","doi":"10.35293/srsa.v43i2.341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-1994 South Africa is founded on values of human dignity, equality and ensuring fundamental human rights for all which are enshrined in its democratic constitution. This comes as the advent of democracy in South Africa from the apartheid past coincided with the advancement of the United Nations Development Programme’s (UNDPs) reconfigured concept of security from a state-centric to a people-focused ideal. The new concept of human security integrates all rights, needs and security of men together with aspirations for sustainable and inclusive development. It advocates for the protection and empowerment of people against threats to their lives, something that the apartheid state failed to do as it was the main orchestrator of human insecurity in the country. Likewise, the article is a qualitative review of the role that human security has played in post-South Africa’s policymaking decisions using the level of analysis approach. The four levels feature the individual, local/provincial, domestic/state and global analysis. These levels of analysis help in shedding qualitative understanding of how a single dynamic in socio-political empowerment affects another. It concludes that despite the notion of human security being widely articulated as a conceptual basis for the country’s official documents, it lacks de facto operational power to shaping actual policy actions.","PeriodicalId":41892,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","volume":"135 10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Review for Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v43i2.341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-1994 South Africa is founded on values of human dignity, equality and ensuring fundamental human rights for all which are enshrined in its democratic constitution. This comes as the advent of democracy in South Africa from the apartheid past coincided with the advancement of the United Nations Development Programme’s (UNDPs) reconfigured concept of security from a state-centric to a people-focused ideal. The new concept of human security integrates all rights, needs and security of men together with aspirations for sustainable and inclusive development. It advocates for the protection and empowerment of people against threats to their lives, something that the apartheid state failed to do as it was the main orchestrator of human insecurity in the country. Likewise, the article is a qualitative review of the role that human security has played in post-South Africa’s policymaking decisions using the level of analysis approach. The four levels feature the individual, local/provincial, domestic/state and global analysis. These levels of analysis help in shedding qualitative understanding of how a single dynamic in socio-political empowerment affects another. It concludes that despite the notion of human security being widely articulated as a conceptual basis for the country’s official documents, it lacks de facto operational power to shaping actual policy actions.
南非人类安全的质量审查:四个层次的分析
1994年以后的南非是建立在人的尊严、平等和确保所有人的基本人权的价值观之上的,这些价值观庄严载入其民主宪法。这是在南非从过去的种族隔离中实现民主的同时,联合国开发计划署(开发计划署)重新配置的安全概念从以国家为中心向以人民为中心的理想迈进。人类安全的新概念将人的所有权利、需要和安全与可持续和包容性发展的愿望结合起来。它倡导保护和赋予人民权力,使其免受生命威胁,这是种族隔离国家未能做到的,因为它是该国人类不安全的主要策划者。同样,这篇文章是对人类安全在后南非政策制定决策中所起作用的定性审查,使用了分析水平的方法。这四个层次的分析包括个人分析、地方/省分析、国内/州分析和全球分析。这些层次的分析有助于定性地理解社会政治赋权中的单一动态如何影响另一个动态。报告的结论是,尽管人类安全的概念被广泛地作为国家官方文件的概念基础加以阐述,但它缺乏形成实际政策行动的实际行动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信