Estimated intake of the artificial sweeteners acesulfame-K, aspartame, cyclamate and saccharin in a group of Swedish diabetics

M. Alzin, S. Jahrl, H. Enghardt-Barbieri, L. Busk
{"title":"Estimated intake of the artificial sweeteners acesulfame-K, aspartame, cyclamate and saccharin in a group of Swedish diabetics","authors":"M. Alzin, S. Jahrl, H. Enghardt-Barbieri, L. Busk","doi":"10.1080/0265203X.2003.11432418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few sweetener intake studies have been performed on the general population and only one study has been specifically designed to investigate diabetics and children. This report describes a Swedish study on the estimated intake of the artificial sweeteners acesulfame-K, aspartame, cyclamate and saccharin by children (0-15 years) and adult male and female diabetics (types I and II) of various ages (16-90 years). Altogether, 1120 participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about their sweetener intake. The response rate (71%, range 59-78%) was comparable across age and gender groups. The most consumed 'light' foodstuffs were diet soda, cider, fruit syrup, table powder, table tablets, table drops, ice cream, chewing gum, throat lozenges, sweets, yoghurt and vitamin C. The major sources of sweetener intake were beverages and table powder. About 70% of the participants, equally distributed across all age groups, read the manufacturer's specifications of the food products' content. The estimated intakes showed that neither men nor women exceeded the ADI for acesulfame-K; however, using worst-case calculations, high intakes were found in young children (169% of ADI). In general, the aspartame intake was low. Children had the highest estimated (worst case) intake of cyclamate (317% of ADI). Children's estimated intake of saccharin only slightly exceeded the ADI at the 5% level for fruit syrup. Children had an unexpected high intake of tabletop sweeteners, which, in Sweden, is normally based on cyclamate. The study was performed during two winter months when it can be assumed that the intake of sweeteners was lower as compared with during warm, summer months. Thus, the present study probably underestimates the average intake on a yearly basis. However, our worst-case calculations based on maximum permitted levels were performed on each individual sweetener, although exposure is probably relatively evenly distributed among all sweeteners, except for cyclamate containing table sweeteners.","PeriodicalId":12310,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants","volume":"146 1","pages":"115 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0265203X.2003.11432418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few sweetener intake studies have been performed on the general population and only one study has been specifically designed to investigate diabetics and children. This report describes a Swedish study on the estimated intake of the artificial sweeteners acesulfame-K, aspartame, cyclamate and saccharin by children (0-15 years) and adult male and female diabetics (types I and II) of various ages (16-90 years). Altogether, 1120 participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about their sweetener intake. The response rate (71%, range 59-78%) was comparable across age and gender groups. The most consumed 'light' foodstuffs were diet soda, cider, fruit syrup, table powder, table tablets, table drops, ice cream, chewing gum, throat lozenges, sweets, yoghurt and vitamin C. The major sources of sweetener intake were beverages and table powder. About 70% of the participants, equally distributed across all age groups, read the manufacturer's specifications of the food products' content. The estimated intakes showed that neither men nor women exceeded the ADI for acesulfame-K; however, using worst-case calculations, high intakes were found in young children (169% of ADI). In general, the aspartame intake was low. Children had the highest estimated (worst case) intake of cyclamate (317% of ADI). Children's estimated intake of saccharin only slightly exceeded the ADI at the 5% level for fruit syrup. Children had an unexpected high intake of tabletop sweeteners, which, in Sweden, is normally based on cyclamate. The study was performed during two winter months when it can be assumed that the intake of sweeteners was lower as compared with during warm, summer months. Thus, the present study probably underestimates the average intake on a yearly basis. However, our worst-case calculations based on maximum permitted levels were performed on each individual sweetener, although exposure is probably relatively evenly distributed among all sweeteners, except for cyclamate containing table sweeteners.
一组瑞典糖尿病患者对人工甜味剂安赛蜜- k、阿斯巴甜、甜蜜素和糖精的估计摄入量
很少有针对普通人群的甜味剂摄入研究,只有一项研究是专门针对糖尿病患者和儿童的。本报告描述了瑞典一项关于儿童(0-15岁)和成年男性和女性糖尿病患者(I型和II型)(16-90岁)人工甜味剂安赛蜜- k、阿斯巴甜、甜蜜素和糖精的估计摄入量的研究。总共有1120名参与者被要求完成一份关于甜味剂摄入量的调查问卷。反应率(71%,范围59-78%)在不同年龄和性别群体中具有可比性。食用最多的“清淡”食物包括无糖汽水、苹果酒、果糖浆、食用粉、食用片、食用滴剂、冰淇淋、口香糖、喉糖、糖果、酸奶和维生素c。食用甜味剂的主要来源是饮料和食用粉。大约70%的参与者,平均分布在所有年龄组中,阅读了制造商对食品内容的说明。估计的摄入量显示,男性和女性都没有超过安赛蜜k的推荐摄入量;然而,根据最坏情况计算,幼儿的摄入量很高(占每日推荐摄入量的169%)。总的来说,阿斯巴甜的摄入量很低。儿童的甜蜜素摄入量估计最高(最坏情况)(每日推荐摄入量的317%)。儿童对糖精的估计摄入量仅略高于水果糖浆5%的推荐摄入量。孩子们意外地摄入了大量的桌上甜味剂,在瑞典,这种甜味剂通常是基于甜蜜素的。这项研究是在冬季的两个月里进行的,在这两个月里,可以假设甜味剂的摄入量比温暖的夏季要低。因此,目前的研究可能低估了每年的平均摄入量。然而,我们的最坏情况计算是基于每种甜味剂的最大允许水平,尽管除了含有甜蜜素的食用甜味剂外,所有甜味剂的暴露程度可能相对均匀分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信