Invariance, symmetry and lawfulness

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
J. L. Rolleri
{"title":"Invariance, symmetry and lawfulness","authors":"J. L. Rolleri","doi":"10.15304/AG.38.2.5567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I attempt mainly to elucidate the claim, advanced by Woorward (1992), that the key notion to characterize physical laws is that of invariance. I draw a distinction betwen two levels of invariance in order to elaborate that thesis. I maintain that distinctive marks of the nomic status of basic laws of physics are either that they hold invariantly, within a domain of applivation, or that they fulfill some principles of symmetry. The fomer mark relatesd to the manner in which physical systems change invariantly whereas the latter concerns to the invariance of the laws themselves. This view contrats with the traditional philosophical thesis that physical laws are true universal statements with a necessary character which differentiate then from accidental true generalizations, which are contingent.","PeriodicalId":41083,"journal":{"name":"Agora-Papeles de Filosofia","volume":"457 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agora-Papeles de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15304/AG.38.2.5567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I attempt mainly to elucidate the claim, advanced by Woorward (1992), that the key notion to characterize physical laws is that of invariance. I draw a distinction betwen two levels of invariance in order to elaborate that thesis. I maintain that distinctive marks of the nomic status of basic laws of physics are either that they hold invariantly, within a domain of applivation, or that they fulfill some principles of symmetry. The fomer mark relatesd to the manner in which physical systems change invariantly whereas the latter concerns to the invariance of the laws themselves. This view contrats with the traditional philosophical thesis that physical laws are true universal statements with a necessary character which differentiate then from accidental true generalizations, which are contingent.
不变性,对称性和合法性
在本文中,我主要试图阐明woodward(1992)提出的主张,即表征物理定律的关键概念是不变性。我在不变性的两个层次之间画了一个区别,以便详细阐述这个论点。我认为,基本物理定律的经济学地位的显著标志,要么是它们在一定的应用范围内保持不变,要么是它们满足某些对称原则。前者与物理系统不变变化的方式有关,而后者则与定律本身的不变性有关。这种观点与传统的哲学命题相反,即物理定律是真正的普遍陈述,具有必要的特征,将其与偶然的真正概括区分开来,后者是偶然的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信