PoDSy 2003: Principles of Dependable Systems

F. Freiling, K. Kursawe, L. Buttyán
{"title":"PoDSy 2003: Principles of Dependable Systems","authors":"F. Freiling, K. Kursawe, L. Buttyán","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2003.10002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dependable systems are supposed to satisfy an ensemble of distinct properties, namely safety, security and availability, to name a few. These properties are in parts complementary and also diverse enough to have spawned complete topic areas of their own. Consequently, work on achieving and validating the different properties has partly been performed in different communities and with varied nuances. Maybe most prominently this is true for the two areas of fault-tolerant systems on the one hand and secure systems (especially cryptography) on the other. For example, researchers in fault-tolerance often make statements about systems by treating cryptographic primitives as black boxes. This is done to simplify analysis and (sometimes) avoid number and probability theory. However, by abstracting away the basic properties of the cryptographic primitives, this severely constrains the ability to conduct rigorous security proofs. Various examples of the past show that by over-abstraction, important attributes got neglected, contributing to attack vulnerabilities in the resultant protocols. But despite these examples, many researchers have confirmed that there are strong similarities between the ways of modeling and handling uncertainty in both areas.","PeriodicalId":90852,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks workshops : [proceedings]. International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks","volume":"40 1","pages":"763"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks workshops : [proceedings]. International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2003.10002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dependable systems are supposed to satisfy an ensemble of distinct properties, namely safety, security and availability, to name a few. These properties are in parts complementary and also diverse enough to have spawned complete topic areas of their own. Consequently, work on achieving and validating the different properties has partly been performed in different communities and with varied nuances. Maybe most prominently this is true for the two areas of fault-tolerant systems on the one hand and secure systems (especially cryptography) on the other. For example, researchers in fault-tolerance often make statements about systems by treating cryptographic primitives as black boxes. This is done to simplify analysis and (sometimes) avoid number and probability theory. However, by abstracting away the basic properties of the cryptographic primitives, this severely constrains the ability to conduct rigorous security proofs. Various examples of the past show that by over-abstraction, important attributes got neglected, contributing to attack vulnerabilities in the resultant protocols. But despite these examples, many researchers have confirmed that there are strong similarities between the ways of modeling and handling uncertainty in both areas.
可靠系统的原则
可靠的系统应该满足一系列不同的特性,例如安全性、安全性和可用性。这些属性在某些方面是互补的,而且也足够多样化,可以衍生出它们自己的完整主题领域。因此,实现和验证不同属性的工作部分是在不同的社区中进行的,并且具有不同的细微差别。对于容错系统和安全系统(尤其是密码学)这两个领域来说,这可能是最明显的。例如,容错研究人员经常把密码原语当作黑盒来描述系统。这样做是为了简化分析,(有时)避免使用数字和概率论。然而,通过抽象加密原语的基本属性,这严重限制了进行严格安全性证明的能力。过去的各种例子表明,由于过度抽象,重要的属性被忽略了,从而导致了最终协议中的攻击漏洞。但是,尽管有这些例子,许多研究人员已经证实,在这两个领域中,建模和处理不确定性的方式有很强的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信