Results of the Australian Midwifery Action Project Education Survey. Paper 2: Barriers to effective midwifery education as identified by midwifery course coordinators

RM MSc (Midwifery) Nicky Leap (Director of Midwifery Practice South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service) , RN CMBA MEd Phd Lesley Barclay (Professor and Director Centre for Family Health and Midwifery, UTS), RN CM BN MN Athena Sheehan (Senior Research Midwife Centre for Family Heath and Midwifery, UTS)
{"title":"Results of the Australian Midwifery Action Project Education Survey. Paper 2: Barriers to effective midwifery education as identified by midwifery course coordinators","authors":"RM MSc (Midwifery) Nicky Leap (Director of Midwifery Practice South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service) ,&nbsp;RN CMBA MEd Phd Lesley Barclay (Professor and Director Centre for Family Health and Midwifery, UTS),&nbsp;RN CM BN MN Athena Sheehan (Senior Research Midwife Centre for Family Heath and Midwifery, UTS)","doi":"10.1016/S1448-8272(03)80010-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is the second in a series of three, reportingon the findings of the Australian Midwifery Action Project (AMAP) Education Survey. It concentrates on the barriers to effective midwifery education as identified by the midwifery course coordinators from the 27 Australian universities providing a midwifery program for initial authorisation to practise as a midwife.</p><p>In line with the major research questions of the AMAP, the midwifery course coordinators were asked to identify what they saw as the barriers to providing quality midwifery education and strategies to overcome these barriers. Their main concerns centred on the difficulties in providing appropriate clinical practice placements, financial pressures for students and barriers to effective teaching and learning. Mostly the strategies were a reversal of the identified barriers. These findings highlight the need for major reform in the way midwifery education is organised and funded in Australia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100149,"journal":{"name":"Australian Midwifery","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(03)80010-X","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144882720380010X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This paper is the second in a series of three, reportingon the findings of the Australian Midwifery Action Project (AMAP) Education Survey. It concentrates on the barriers to effective midwifery education as identified by the midwifery course coordinators from the 27 Australian universities providing a midwifery program for initial authorisation to practise as a midwife.

In line with the major research questions of the AMAP, the midwifery course coordinators were asked to identify what they saw as the barriers to providing quality midwifery education and strategies to overcome these barriers. Their main concerns centred on the difficulties in providing appropriate clinical practice placements, financial pressures for students and barriers to effective teaching and learning. Mostly the strategies were a reversal of the identified barriers. These findings highlight the need for major reform in the way midwifery education is organised and funded in Australia.

澳大利亚助产行动项目教育调查结果。论文2:助产课程协调员确定的有效助产教育的障碍
本文是澳大利亚助产行动项目(AMAP)教育调查的三篇系列报告中的第二篇。它集中于有效助产教育的障碍,这些障碍是由来自27所澳大利亚大学的助产课程协调员确定的,这些大学提供助产课程,以获得作为助产士的初步授权。根据该方案的主要研究问题,请助产学课程协调员确定他们认为提供优质助产学教育的障碍和克服这些障碍的战略。他们的主要关切集中在提供适当的临床实习机会的困难、学生的经济压力以及有效教学的障碍。这些策略大多是对已确定的障碍的逆转。这些发现强调了在澳大利亚组织和资助助产教育的方式上进行重大改革的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信