Counterfeiting: Exploring mitigation capabilities and resilience in South African pharmaceutical supply chains

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
C. Terblanche, W. Niemann
{"title":"Counterfeiting: Exploring mitigation capabilities and resilience in South African pharmaceutical supply chains","authors":"C. Terblanche, W. Niemann","doi":"10.4102/ac.v21i1.963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Orientation: Pharmaceutical supply chains (SCs) are experiencing a growing emergence of illicit trade of counterfeited products. This threat is amplified because of global distributed SC networks, increased access to the Internet and challenging economic conditions.Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore risk mitigation capabilities and SC resilience (SCRES) to reduce the effects of counterfeiting in the South African pharmaceutical industry.Motivation for the study: Developing countries such as South Africa tend to be more vulnerable to counterfeiting, as these countries do not have established responses that are seen in more developed countries, such as SC regulation, track-and-trace technology and enforcement regimes.Research design, approach and method: This study employed a generic qualitative research design. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from 12 pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors and retailers in the South African pharmaceutical industry. A thematic analysis approach was followed to analyse the collected data.Main findings: The findings show that the sources of counterfeiting stem from the local and outsourced manufacturing of counterfeited products, presence of unauthorised distributors and importing of counterfeit products. Risk awareness can be enhanced by collaborating with industry members, training members to identify counterfeits and by developing authentication technologies. The industry actively combats counterfeiting by using SCRES enablers including visibility, collaboration, information sharing and by developing an SC risk management culture.Practical/managerial implications: South African pharmaceutical firms have limited resilience. Therefore, managers should develop flexibility, agility, sensing and redundancy as resilience enables firms to combat counterfeiting.Contribution/value-add: This study expands the current literature by identifying the unique sources of counterfeiting and risk mitigation capabilities to combat counterfeiting in pharmaceutical firms in a developing country context.","PeriodicalId":55663,"journal":{"name":"Acta Commercii","volume":"255 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Commercii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v21i1.963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Orientation: Pharmaceutical supply chains (SCs) are experiencing a growing emergence of illicit trade of counterfeited products. This threat is amplified because of global distributed SC networks, increased access to the Internet and challenging economic conditions.Research purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore risk mitigation capabilities and SC resilience (SCRES) to reduce the effects of counterfeiting in the South African pharmaceutical industry.Motivation for the study: Developing countries such as South Africa tend to be more vulnerable to counterfeiting, as these countries do not have established responses that are seen in more developed countries, such as SC regulation, track-and-trace technology and enforcement regimes.Research design, approach and method: This study employed a generic qualitative research design. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data from 12 pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors and retailers in the South African pharmaceutical industry. A thematic analysis approach was followed to analyse the collected data.Main findings: The findings show that the sources of counterfeiting stem from the local and outsourced manufacturing of counterfeited products, presence of unauthorised distributors and importing of counterfeit products. Risk awareness can be enhanced by collaborating with industry members, training members to identify counterfeits and by developing authentication technologies. The industry actively combats counterfeiting by using SCRES enablers including visibility, collaboration, information sharing and by developing an SC risk management culture.Practical/managerial implications: South African pharmaceutical firms have limited resilience. Therefore, managers should develop flexibility, agility, sensing and redundancy as resilience enables firms to combat counterfeiting.Contribution/value-add: This study expands the current literature by identifying the unique sources of counterfeiting and risk mitigation capabilities to combat counterfeiting in pharmaceutical firms in a developing country context.
假冒:探索南非药品供应链的减缓能力和复原力
方向:药品供应链(SCs)正在经历日益增多的假冒产品非法贸易。由于全球分布式SC网络、互联网接入的增加和具有挑战性的经济条件,这种威胁被放大了。研究目的:本研究的目的是探讨风险缓解能力和供应链弹性(SCRES),以减少假冒在南非制药业的影响。这项研究的动机:像南非这样的发展中国家往往更容易受到假冒的影响,因为这些国家没有在更发达国家看到的成熟的应对措施,例如SC监管、追踪和追踪技术以及执法制度。研究设计、途径与方法:本研究采用一般定性研究设计。半结构化访谈用于收集来自南非制药业的12家药品制造商、分销商和零售商的数据。采用专题分析方法分析收集到的数据。主要调查结果:调查结果表明,假冒产品的来源来自本地和外包制造假冒产品,存在未经授权的分销商和进口假冒产品。可以通过与行业成员合作、培训成员识别假冒产品以及开发认证技术来提高风险意识。通过使用scs,包括可见性、协作、信息共享和开发SC风险管理文化,行业积极打击假冒。实际/管理意义:南非制药公司的弹性有限。因此,管理者应该发展灵活性、敏捷性、感知和冗余,因为弹性使公司能够打击假冒。贡献/增值:本研究通过确定发展中国家制药公司制假的独特来源和降低风险的能力,扩展了现有文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Commercii
Acta Commercii Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信