Evaluation and analysis of SDG reporting: evidence from Africa

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
O. Erin, O. Bamigboye
{"title":"Evaluation and analysis of SDG reporting: evidence from Africa","authors":"O. Erin, O. Bamigboye","doi":"10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe 2030 Agenda and the sustainable development goals (SDG) have gained considerable attention in research and public debate. This calls for accounting research on the subject of SDG disclosure. Based on this premise, this paper aims to evaluate and analyze the extent of SDG reporting by 80 listed firms from 8 selected African countries for the period of 2016 to 2018.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study adopts a content analysis and survey method to evaluate the extent of SDG reporting by the selected African countries. This paper conducted content analysis through the use of the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) framework and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework to gauge the extent of firms’ compliance with SDG reporting. Also, this paper uses the business reporting indicators for each SDG developed by GRI to determine the compliance level of the selected firms regarding SDG reporting. The survey was targeted at the big four audit firms (PwC, KPMG, Ernst and Young and Deloitte and Touche).\n\n\nFindings\nThe evaluation of SDG disclosure by the 80 listed firms in Africa is still at a very low level except for South African firms. Also, the findings of the business reporting indicators for each SDG target show that most of the firms show little or no concern to report on SDG activities. The result of the research survey indicates that voluntary disclosure, lack of management commitment, lack of regulatory enforcement and cost implications account for low SDG disclosure by the selected African firms.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study fails to consider the qualitative research approach in determining the extent of SDG disclosure in Africa, as the study did not allow respondents to freely express their opinion on SDG disclosure, as a large part of the survey used close-ended questionnaires.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study’s findings call for clear responsibility and a strong drive for SDG performance from corporate institutions in Africa. While the overall responsibility rests on the government, the actualization of SDG cannot be achieved without support from corporate organizations. The empirical approach used in this study emphasizes the need for corporate organizations to embrace sustainable practices and to integrate SDG information into their reporting cycle.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to growing literature in the area of corporate reporting, sustainability reporting and SDG research in Africa and other emerging economies. Also, this study provides original insight into the contribution of accounting research toward the achievement of SDG.\n","PeriodicalId":46141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2020-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Purpose The 2030 Agenda and the sustainable development goals (SDG) have gained considerable attention in research and public debate. This calls for accounting research on the subject of SDG disclosure. Based on this premise, this paper aims to evaluate and analyze the extent of SDG reporting by 80 listed firms from 8 selected African countries for the period of 2016 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a content analysis and survey method to evaluate the extent of SDG reporting by the selected African countries. This paper conducted content analysis through the use of the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) framework and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework to gauge the extent of firms’ compliance with SDG reporting. Also, this paper uses the business reporting indicators for each SDG developed by GRI to determine the compliance level of the selected firms regarding SDG reporting. The survey was targeted at the big four audit firms (PwC, KPMG, Ernst and Young and Deloitte and Touche). Findings The evaluation of SDG disclosure by the 80 listed firms in Africa is still at a very low level except for South African firms. Also, the findings of the business reporting indicators for each SDG target show that most of the firms show little or no concern to report on SDG activities. The result of the research survey indicates that voluntary disclosure, lack of management commitment, lack of regulatory enforcement and cost implications account for low SDG disclosure by the selected African firms. Research limitations/implications This study fails to consider the qualitative research approach in determining the extent of SDG disclosure in Africa, as the study did not allow respondents to freely express their opinion on SDG disclosure, as a large part of the survey used close-ended questionnaires. Practical implications This study’s findings call for clear responsibility and a strong drive for SDG performance from corporate institutions in Africa. While the overall responsibility rests on the government, the actualization of SDG cannot be achieved without support from corporate organizations. The empirical approach used in this study emphasizes the need for corporate organizations to embrace sustainable practices and to integrate SDG information into their reporting cycle. Originality/value This study contributes to growing literature in the area of corporate reporting, sustainability reporting and SDG research in Africa and other emerging economies. Also, this study provides original insight into the contribution of accounting research toward the achievement of SDG.
可持续发展目标报告的评价和分析:来自非洲的证据
《2030年议程》和可持续发展目标(SDG)在研究和公共辩论中得到了相当大的关注。这就要求对可持续发展目标披露这一主题进行会计研究。基于这一前提,本文旨在评估和分析2016年至2018年8个非洲国家的80家上市公司的可持续发展目标报告程度。设计/方法/方法该研究采用内容分析和调查方法来评估选定的非洲国家报告可持续发展目标的程度。本文通过使用普华永道(PwC)框架和全球报告倡议组织(GRI)框架进行内容分析,以衡量企业遵守可持续发展目标报告的程度。此外,本文使用GRI制定的每个可持续发展目标的业务报告指标来确定所选公司对可持续发展目标报告的合规水平。这项调查的对象是四大审计公司(普华永道、毕马威、安永和德勤)。除南非公司外,非洲80家上市公司对可持续发展目标披露的评价仍处于很低的水平。此外,每个可持续发展目标的业务报告指标的调查结果表明,大多数公司很少或根本不关心报告可持续发展目标活动。研究调查结果表明,自愿披露、缺乏管理层承诺、缺乏监管执法和成本影响是所选非洲公司可持续发展目标披露低的原因。本研究在确定非洲可持续发展目标披露的程度时没有考虑到定性研究方法,因为该研究不允许受访者自由表达他们对可持续发展目标披露的意见,因为大部分调查使用了封闭式问卷。实际意义本研究的结果呼吁非洲企业机构明确责任,并大力推动可持续发展目标的实现。虽然总体责任在于政府,但可持续发展目标的实现离不开企业组织的支持。本研究中使用的实证方法强调了企业组织接受可持续实践并将可持续发展目标信息纳入其报告周期的必要性。原创性/价值本研究有助于非洲和其他新兴经济体企业报告、可持续发展报告和可持续发展目标研究领域的文献增长。此外,本研究对会计研究对实现可持续发展目标的贡献提供了独到的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners from multiple disciplines to disseminate information on organizational and accounting systems change. To achieve this, the journal will be directed at mapping out contemporary changes in the new global business environment. It will seek to explain the new techniques, processes, and philosophies associated with the rise of strategy-oriented accounting and information systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信