The creation of the UTS Social Impact Framework: A collaborative approach for transformational change

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
M. Gusheh, V. Firth, C. Netherton, C. Pettigrew
{"title":"The creation of the UTS Social Impact Framework: A collaborative approach for transformational change","authors":"M. Gusheh, V. Firth, C. Netherton, C. Pettigrew","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between education and public purpose has been historical and remains fundamental to the core mission of the higher education sector. Alongside the growth of engaged scholarship and practice, increasing and, at times, competing forces work to influence institutional focus and direction. Key amongst these are global university ranking systems, which have begun to shift their gaze beyond traditional notions of academic excellence to also consider impact and engagement. The tension between external and internal drivers for social engagement can fragment institutional focus and undermine community impact. In the face of this challenge, holistic institutional frameworks that systemically and culturally underpin, enable and make inherent engaged scholarship remain scarce. Their absence risks marginalising engaged university practice, teaching and research, thereby limiting the potential impact of universities. \nThis article aims to address this gap in the literature by examining the question of how universities can create a whole-of-institution approach to their public purpose agenda. Using the University of Technology Sydney as a case, the development of the UTS Social Impact Framework is shared here. We detail the use of Appreciative Inquiry and Theory of Change as underpinning participatory methodologies that have resulted in a systems approach to change, based on institutional strengths. The resulting framework articulates a shared vision and outlines a guiding roadmap encompassing six domains of change, expressed as outcomes, and an additional three preconditions. Woven together, these create a robust image of the systemic and cultural dynamics needed to realise the shared vision of the university, ensuring that contribution to social outcomes remains a core mission of this higher education institution. The adopted approach used in this study can inform the development of contextually relevant frameworks across the sector, with potential to reposition engagement, beyond an aspect of practice, as a systemic precondition that enables broader social change.","PeriodicalId":53967,"journal":{"name":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","volume":"252 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gateways-International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The relationship between education and public purpose has been historical and remains fundamental to the core mission of the higher education sector. Alongside the growth of engaged scholarship and practice, increasing and, at times, competing forces work to influence institutional focus and direction. Key amongst these are global university ranking systems, which have begun to shift their gaze beyond traditional notions of academic excellence to also consider impact and engagement. The tension between external and internal drivers for social engagement can fragment institutional focus and undermine community impact. In the face of this challenge, holistic institutional frameworks that systemically and culturally underpin, enable and make inherent engaged scholarship remain scarce. Their absence risks marginalising engaged university practice, teaching and research, thereby limiting the potential impact of universities. This article aims to address this gap in the literature by examining the question of how universities can create a whole-of-institution approach to their public purpose agenda. Using the University of Technology Sydney as a case, the development of the UTS Social Impact Framework is shared here. We detail the use of Appreciative Inquiry and Theory of Change as underpinning participatory methodologies that have resulted in a systems approach to change, based on institutional strengths. The resulting framework articulates a shared vision and outlines a guiding roadmap encompassing six domains of change, expressed as outcomes, and an additional three preconditions. Woven together, these create a robust image of the systemic and cultural dynamics needed to realise the shared vision of the university, ensuring that contribution to social outcomes remains a core mission of this higher education institution. The adopted approach used in this study can inform the development of contextually relevant frameworks across the sector, with potential to reposition engagement, beyond an aspect of practice, as a systemic precondition that enables broader social change.
UTS社会影响框架的创建:转型变革的协作方法
教育与公共目标之间的关系是历史的,并且仍然是高等教育部门核心使命的基础。随着学术和实践的发展,越来越多的、有时是相互竞争的力量在影响机构的重点和方向。其中最关键的是全球大学排名系统,该系统已开始将目光从传统的学术卓越观念转移到考虑影响力和参与度。社会参与的外部和内部驱动因素之间的紧张关系可能会破坏机构的关注,破坏社区的影响。面对这一挑战,从系统和文化上支持、支持和创造内在参与型学术的整体制度框架仍然稀缺。他们的缺席可能会使大学的实践、教学和研究边缘化,从而限制大学的潜在影响。本文旨在通过研究大学如何为其公共目的议程创建一个全机构方法的问题来解决文献中的这一差距。以悉尼科技大学为例,分享悉尼科技大学社会影响框架的发展。我们详细介绍了欣赏式调查和变革理论作为参与式方法的基础,这些方法基于制度优势,形成了变革的系统方法。最终的框架阐明了一个共同的愿景,并概述了一个包含六个变化领域的指导性路线图,表示为结果,以及另外三个先决条件。交织在一起,这些创造了一个强大的系统和文化动态的形象,需要实现大学的共同愿景,确保对社会成果的贡献仍然是这个高等教育机构的核心使命。本研究中采用的方法可以为整个行业的背景相关框架的发展提供信息,有可能将参与重新定位,超越实践的一个方面,作为实现更广泛社会变革的系统性先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
5
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信