Comparative analysis of mercenary activities in international documents and criminal acts criminalizing warfare abroad in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia

Ana Mutavdžić
{"title":"Comparative analysis of mercenary activities in international documents and criminal acts criminalizing warfare abroad in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia","authors":"Ana Mutavdžić","doi":"10.5937/nabepo28-42602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mercenary activities in wars and other armed conflicts, as a social phenomenon, do not stop intriguing both in moral, legal and financial terms, from the first armed conflicts until today. Although present practically throughout the entire human history, the regulation of mercenary activities from the aspect of international law as well as national legislation was completely neglected until recently. It was only after the World War II that the first international documents were created that tried to define and identify mercenaries as a serious threat to international security. Much later, the norms of national (criminal) legislation began to treat the activities of mercenaries as criminal acts, that is, mercenaries as criminals. Accordingly, in this research work the author will try to answer several, today more than ever, current problematic issues, which are based on the harmonization, that is, the non-harmonization of the norms regulating the field of mercenary in the acts of international law and our national criminal legislation, which tried to regulate the field of mercenary work within the national framework - with amendments to the Criminal Code from 2014.","PeriodicalId":33498,"journal":{"name":"NBP Nauka bezbednost policija","volume":"451 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NBP Nauka bezbednost policija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/nabepo28-42602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mercenary activities in wars and other armed conflicts, as a social phenomenon, do not stop intriguing both in moral, legal and financial terms, from the first armed conflicts until today. Although present practically throughout the entire human history, the regulation of mercenary activities from the aspect of international law as well as national legislation was completely neglected until recently. It was only after the World War II that the first international documents were created that tried to define and identify mercenaries as a serious threat to international security. Much later, the norms of national (criminal) legislation began to treat the activities of mercenaries as criminal acts, that is, mercenaries as criminals. Accordingly, in this research work the author will try to answer several, today more than ever, current problematic issues, which are based on the harmonization, that is, the non-harmonization of the norms regulating the field of mercenary in the acts of international law and our national criminal legislation, which tried to regulate the field of mercenary work within the national framework - with amendments to the Criminal Code from 2014.
国际文件中的雇佣军活动与塞尔维亚共和国《刑法》将国外战争定为犯罪的犯罪行为的比较分析
从第一次武装冲突到今天,战争和其他武装冲突中的雇佣军活动作为一种社会现象,在道德、法律和财政方面都没有停止引起人们的兴趣。尽管几乎贯穿整个人类历史,但从国际法和国家立法方面对雇佣军活动的管制直到最近才完全被忽视。直到第二次世界大战后,才产生了第一批国际文件,试图将雇佣军定义和确定为对国际安全的严重威胁。很久以后,国家(刑事)立法规范开始将雇佣军的活动视为犯罪行为,即将雇佣军视为罪犯。因此,在这项研究工作中,作者将试图回答几个,今天比以往任何时候,当前的问题问题,这是基于协调,即,规范雇佣军领域的国际法行为和我们的国家刑事立法的不协调,这试图在国家框架内规范雇佣军领域的工作-从2014年刑法修正案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信