ASSESSMENT OF CROPPING SYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY, PROFITABILITY AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT

Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041
M. Nawaz, S. Anjum, U. Ashraf, I. Khan, S. Hussain, A. Zohaib, Y. Hubiao, W. Zhiyong
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF CROPPING SYSTEM PRODUCTIVITY, PROFITABILITY AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT","authors":"M. Nawaz, S. Anjum, U. Ashraf, I. Khan, S. Hussain, A. Zohaib, Y. Hubiao, W. Zhiyong","doi":"10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cropping system throughout assessment exhibits importance for the crop production and cultural practices profitability. This field study was undertaken in semi-arid climate to devise suitable system. Wheat was sown in winter season while, summer crops include; cotton, maize and mungbean, which were sown under conventional tillage (CT), permanent beds (PB) and no tillage (NT) respectively. Yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by tillage systems, highest productive tillers (m), grains per spike and 1000-grain weight (g) was observed in permanent beds (PB). Grain yield (tha) was also significantly higher (4.03 t ha) in PB. System productivity in terms of wheat equivalent yield (WEY) of maize-wheat (MW) under PB was higher (10.26 t ha) followed by mungbean-wheat in permanent bed (9.40 t ha) and cotton-wheat in conventional tillage (9.26 tha). Highest cultivation cost was observed in the cotton-wheat followed by maize-wheat under conventional tillage and least was observed in the mungbean-wheat in no tillage. Cotton-wheat (CW) gave maximum net field benefit (US$. 1606.53ha) in under PB followed by mungbean-wheat (MbW) (US$.1411.72ha). However, maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) (3.77) was recorded in mungbean-wheat system. Moreover, the cotton-wheat in permanent bed system was the best possible option for acquiring high production and land","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36899/japs.2020.2.0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Cropping system throughout assessment exhibits importance for the crop production and cultural practices profitability. This field study was undertaken in semi-arid climate to devise suitable system. Wheat was sown in winter season while, summer crops include; cotton, maize and mungbean, which were sown under conventional tillage (CT), permanent beds (PB) and no tillage (NT) respectively. Yield and yield attributes were significantly influenced by tillage systems, highest productive tillers (m), grains per spike and 1000-grain weight (g) was observed in permanent beds (PB). Grain yield (tha) was also significantly higher (4.03 t ha) in PB. System productivity in terms of wheat equivalent yield (WEY) of maize-wheat (MW) under PB was higher (10.26 t ha) followed by mungbean-wheat in permanent bed (9.40 t ha) and cotton-wheat in conventional tillage (9.26 tha). Highest cultivation cost was observed in the cotton-wheat followed by maize-wheat under conventional tillage and least was observed in the mungbean-wheat in no tillage. Cotton-wheat (CW) gave maximum net field benefit (US$. 1606.53ha) in under PB followed by mungbean-wheat (MbW) (US$.1411.72ha). However, maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) (3.77) was recorded in mungbean-wheat system. Moreover, the cotton-wheat in permanent bed system was the best possible option for acquiring high production and land
分享
查看原文
小麦种植制度生产力、盈利能力和经济效益评价
整个评估显示出种植制度对作物生产和文化实践盈利能力的重要性。本研究是在半干旱气候条件下进行的,以设计合适的系统。小麦在冬季播种,而夏季作物包括;棉花、玉米和绿豆分别采用常规耕作(CT)、永久垄作(PB)和免耕(NT)。不同耕作制度对产量和产量性状有显著影响,永久床(PB)的最高有效分蘖数(m)、每穗粒数和千粒重(g)。籽粒产量(tha)也显著高于PB (4.03 tha)。以玉米-小麦(MW)的小麦当量产量(WEY)计算,PB模式下的系统生产力最高(10.26 tha),其次是绿豆-小麦(9.40 tha)和常规耕作的棉麦(9.26 tha)。常规耕作方式下,棉花-小麦种植成本最高,其次是玉米-小麦,免耕方式下绿豆-小麦种植成本最低。棉麦(CW)的田间净效益最高(美元)。其次是绿豆小麦(MbW)(1.1411.72公顷)。而绿豆-小麦体系的最大效益成本比(BCR)为3.77。此外,棉麦永久床制是获得高产和土地的最佳选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信