{"title":"Determination of death.","authors":"Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, Dear Assemblyman Miller","doi":"10.1001/jama.1892.02411110025011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is my carefully considered opinion that: 1) This bill as written is and has always been unacceptable. 2) Any bill defining death must contain the following clarification as I wrote in my responsum: “The sole criterion of death is the total cessation of spontaneous respiration.” In a patient presenting the clinical picture of death, i.e., no signs of life such as movement of response to stimuli, the total cessation of independent respiration, is an absolute proof that death had occurred. This interruption of spontaneous breathing must be for a sufficient length of time for resuscitation to be impossible (approximately 15 min.). If such a “clinically dead” patient is on a respirator it is forbidden to interrupt the respirator. However, when the respirator requires servicing, the services may be withheld while the patient is carefully and continuously monitored to detect any signs of independent breathing no matter how feeble. If such breathing motions do not occur, it is a certainty that he is dead. If they do occur the respirator shall be immediately restarted. I must emphasize that any bill which does not contain these criteria is unacceptable. 3) In the event that these specific requirements will not be incorporated in your bill, I strongly endorse and support the “religious exemption” clause in the Governor’s Program Bill, a concept which is in keeping with religious rights and social ethics.","PeriodicalId":83659,"journal":{"name":"Code of Alabama, 1975 : with provision for subsequent pocket parts. Alabama","volume":"46 1","pages":"Unknown"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Code of Alabama, 1975 : with provision for subsequent pocket parts. Alabama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1892.02411110025011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
It is my carefully considered opinion that: 1) This bill as written is and has always been unacceptable. 2) Any bill defining death must contain the following clarification as I wrote in my responsum: “The sole criterion of death is the total cessation of spontaneous respiration.” In a patient presenting the clinical picture of death, i.e., no signs of life such as movement of response to stimuli, the total cessation of independent respiration, is an absolute proof that death had occurred. This interruption of spontaneous breathing must be for a sufficient length of time for resuscitation to be impossible (approximately 15 min.). If such a “clinically dead” patient is on a respirator it is forbidden to interrupt the respirator. However, when the respirator requires servicing, the services may be withheld while the patient is carefully and continuously monitored to detect any signs of independent breathing no matter how feeble. If such breathing motions do not occur, it is a certainty that he is dead. If they do occur the respirator shall be immediately restarted. I must emphasize that any bill which does not contain these criteria is unacceptable. 3) In the event that these specific requirements will not be incorporated in your bill, I strongly endorse and support the “religious exemption” clause in the Governor’s Program Bill, a concept which is in keeping with religious rights and social ethics.