A Study in Accountability of Clubhouses in Japan, UK, and Italy

自我保健 Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.2190/SH.7.1.F
Rosario Laratta
{"title":"A Study in Accountability of Clubhouses in Japan, UK, and Italy","authors":"Rosario Laratta","doi":"10.2190/SH.7.1.F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many International Clubhouses are dependent on the state financially; this can potentially undermine their accountability to International Clubhouse Standards, and ultimately to members. Dependence on government funding can compromise Clubhouse autonomy and staff can end up elevating financial and regulatory accountability over member accountability. In order to shed light on how dependence on government affects accountability to members, Clubhouse affiliates in Japan, the United Kingdom, and Italy were investigated in a 2-year project funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This study found out that reactions to accountability in Clubhouses vary according to the different kinds of staff. In the United Kingdom and Italy, where staff feel aligned with members (sympathetic staff), staff felt more of a conflict with government standards but also felt less of a need to institutionalize accountability to members. In contrast, it was found that in Japan—where staff had a professional orientation and were more concerned with the community or society at large—staff did not feel a conflict with government standards but they also elevated accountability to the community rather than accountability to members. *This research was supported by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.","PeriodicalId":64356,"journal":{"name":"自我保健","volume":"59 1","pages":"81-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"自我保健","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/SH.7.1.F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Many International Clubhouses are dependent on the state financially; this can potentially undermine their accountability to International Clubhouse Standards, and ultimately to members. Dependence on government funding can compromise Clubhouse autonomy and staff can end up elevating financial and regulatory accountability over member accountability. In order to shed light on how dependence on government affects accountability to members, Clubhouse affiliates in Japan, the United Kingdom, and Italy were investigated in a 2-year project funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This study found out that reactions to accountability in Clubhouses vary according to the different kinds of staff. In the United Kingdom and Italy, where staff feel aligned with members (sympathetic staff), staff felt more of a conflict with government standards but also felt less of a need to institutionalize accountability to members. In contrast, it was found that in Japan—where staff had a professional orientation and were more concerned with the community or society at large—staff did not feel a conflict with government standards but they also elevated accountability to the community rather than accountability to members. *This research was supported by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
日本、英国、意大利俱乐部的问责制研究
许多国际俱乐部在财政上依赖于国家;这可能会破坏他们对国际俱乐部标准的责任,并最终破坏对会员的责任。对政府资金的依赖可能会损害俱乐部的自主权,工作人员最终可能会将财务和监管责任提升到对会员的责任之上。为了阐明对政府的依赖如何影响对会员的责任,在日本科学促进会资助的一个为期两年的项目中,对日本、英国和意大利的Clubhouse附属机构进行了调查。本研究发现,不同类型的员工对俱乐部问责制的反应不同。在英国和意大利,工作人员感到与成员一致(同情的工作人员),工作人员更多地感到与政府标准冲突,但也不太需要将对成员的责任制度化。相比之下,在日本,工作人员以专业为导向,更关心社区或社会,工作人员并不觉得与政府标准有冲突,但他们也提高了对社区的问责,而不是对成员的问责。*这项研究得到了日本科学促进会的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20554
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信