The Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative (GAMI): Part 2 – Screening protocol

A. P. Fischer, M. Callaghan, L. Berrang‐Ford, Miriam Nielsen, Garry Sotnik, I. V. Canosa, Neal R Haddaway, R. Biesbroek, S. Harper, J. Minx, E. Perez, D. Reckien, M. V. Aalst
{"title":"The Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative (GAMI): Part 2 – Screening protocol","authors":"A. P. Fischer, M. Callaghan, L. Berrang‐Ford, Miriam Nielsen, Garry Sotnik, I. V. Canosa, Neal R Haddaway, R. Biesbroek, S. Harper, J. Minx, E. Perez, D. Reckien, M. V. Aalst","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.PEX-1241/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Context: It is now widely accepted that the climate is changing, and that societal response will need to be rapid and comprehensive to prevent the most severe impacts. A key milestone in global climate governance is to assess progress on adaptation. To-date, however, there has been negligible robust, systematic synthesis of progress on adaptation or adaptation-relevant responses globally. Aim: The purpose of this review protocol is to outline the methods used by the Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative (GAMI) to systematically review human adaptation responses to climate-related changes that have been documented globally since 2013 in the scientific literature. The broad question underpinning this review is: Are we adapting to climate change? More specifically, we ask ‘what is the evidence relating to human adaptation-related responses that can (or are) directly reducing risk, exposure, and/or vulnerability to climate change?’ Methods: We review scientific literature 2013-2019 to identify documents empirically reporting on observed adaptation-related responses to climate change in human systems that can directly reduce risk. We exclude non-empirical (theoretical & conceptual) literature and adaptation in natural systems that occurs without human intervention. Included documents were coded across a set of questions focused on: Who is responding? What responses are documented? What is the extent of the adaptation-related response? What is the evidence that adaptation-related responses reduce risk, exposure and/or vulnerability? Once articles are coded, we conduct a quality appraisal of the coding and develop ‘evidence packages’ for regions and sectors. We supplement this systematic mapping with an expert elicitation exercise, undertaken to assess bias and validity of insights from included/coded literature vis a vis perceptions of real-world adaptation for global regions and sectors, with associated confidence assessments. Related protocols: This protocol represents Part 2 of a 5-part series outlining the phases of methods for this initiative. Part 2 outlines the methods used to conduct keyword searches and implement machine-assisted screening of documents based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. See Figures 1 and 2.","PeriodicalId":20660,"journal":{"name":"Protocol exchange","volume":"17 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protocol exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.PEX-1241/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Context: It is now widely accepted that the climate is changing, and that societal response will need to be rapid and comprehensive to prevent the most severe impacts. A key milestone in global climate governance is to assess progress on adaptation. To-date, however, there has been negligible robust, systematic synthesis of progress on adaptation or adaptation-relevant responses globally. Aim: The purpose of this review protocol is to outline the methods used by the Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative (GAMI) to systematically review human adaptation responses to climate-related changes that have been documented globally since 2013 in the scientific literature. The broad question underpinning this review is: Are we adapting to climate change? More specifically, we ask ‘what is the evidence relating to human adaptation-related responses that can (or are) directly reducing risk, exposure, and/or vulnerability to climate change?’ Methods: We review scientific literature 2013-2019 to identify documents empirically reporting on observed adaptation-related responses to climate change in human systems that can directly reduce risk. We exclude non-empirical (theoretical & conceptual) literature and adaptation in natural systems that occurs without human intervention. Included documents were coded across a set of questions focused on: Who is responding? What responses are documented? What is the extent of the adaptation-related response? What is the evidence that adaptation-related responses reduce risk, exposure and/or vulnerability? Once articles are coded, we conduct a quality appraisal of the coding and develop ‘evidence packages’ for regions and sectors. We supplement this systematic mapping with an expert elicitation exercise, undertaken to assess bias and validity of insights from included/coded literature vis a vis perceptions of real-world adaptation for global regions and sectors, with associated confidence assessments. Related protocols: This protocol represents Part 2 of a 5-part series outlining the phases of methods for this initiative. Part 2 outlines the methods used to conduct keyword searches and implement machine-assisted screening of documents based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. See Figures 1 and 2.
全球适应测绘倡议(GAMI):第2部分-筛选方案
背景:现在人们普遍认为气候正在变化,社会需要迅速而全面地作出反应,以防止最严重的影响。评估适应气候变化的进展是全球气候治理的一个重要里程碑。然而,迄今为止,全球在适应或与适应相关的应对措施方面取得的稳健、系统的综合进展微不足道。目的:本审查方案的目的是概述全球适应测绘倡议(GAMI)系统审查自2013年以来全球科学文献中记录的人类对气候相关变化的适应反应所使用的方法。支撑这份报告的一个广泛问题是:我们是否在适应气候变化?更具体地说,我们的问题是“与人类适应相关的反应能够(或正在)直接降低风险、暴露和/或易受气候变化影响的证据是什么?”“方法:我们回顾了2013-2019年的科学文献,以确定可直接降低风险的人类系统中观察到的与气候变化适应相关的响应的实证报告。我们排除了在没有人类干预的情况下发生的非经验(理论和概念)文献和自然系统中的适应。所包含的文档通过一系列问题进行编码,这些问题主要集中在:谁在响应?记录了哪些响应?与适应相关的反应程度如何?有什么证据表明与适应相关的应对措施可以降低风险、暴露和/或脆弱性?文章编码后,我们对编码进行质量评估,并为各地区和部门制定“证据包”。我们通过专家启发练习来补充这一系统制图,以评估来自纳入/编码文献的见解相对于全球地区和部门对现实世界适应的看法的偏差和有效性,并进行相关的置信度评估。相关协议:该协议是概述该计划的方法阶段的5部分系列的第2部分。第2部分概述了用于执行关键字搜索和基于包含和排除标准实现文档的机器辅助筛选的方法。参见图1和图2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信