Systemic Immunological Responses Among Dental Infection Patients

Z. Mahdi, F. Abood
{"title":"Systemic Immunological Responses Among Dental Infection Patients","authors":"Z. Mahdi, F. Abood","doi":"10.11648/J.IJI.20210901.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluating of some immunological responses among dental infection patients is essential in the clinical management of oral infection. Our study considered isolation of dental infection bacteria and quantitative evaluation of serum. IgA, IL-4, IL-7 and CD4 and CD8 molecules among dental plaque patients and control group. Oral bacteria from dental infection patients were isolated in appropriate media and diagnosed by biochemical tests and in vitro quantitative determination of serum IgA, IL-4, IL-7 and CD4 and CD8 molecules using ELISA technique. Single and mixed bacterial isolates were noted, mixed infection were (59.25%), the nature of bacteria was Gram positive cocci Streptococcus viridans, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactocacilli spps, in addition to Gram negative rods black- pigmented bacteria, Klebsilla pneumonia, and Esherishia coli. Serum IgA was higher in patients (368.8±182.5) ng\\ml than in control group (319.92±79.26) ng\\ml. Serum IL-4 was higher patients (285.33±86.12) pg/ml than in control group (257.7±94.14) pg\\ml. Serum IL-7 was higher in control group (19.59±4.14) pg/ml than in dental plaque patients (17.98±3.18) pg /ml. Serum CD4 molecules was higher in control group (1.371±0.5242) ng/ml than in dental plaque patients (1.326±0.1292) ng/ml. Serum CD8 molecules shows non-significant elevation in patients group 0.5825±0.02717 (ng\\ml) than in control group 0.51±0.01643 (ng\\ml) P≤0.05. Mean of the CD4/CD8 ratio was higher 2.783±1.126 in control group while it was 2.355±0.24 in dental plaque patients, however the differences were non-significant (P≤0.05). The present study conclude that the bacteria isolated from dental infection patients were mixed more than single infection, there were non-significant elevation in IgA, IL-4, and CD8 in patients while IL-7 and CD4 was lower in patients group than in control group, while CD4\\CD8 ratio were lower in patients group, these result reflect the fact that mucosal antigen induce systemic tolerance to some extent since these bacteria present in oral cavity in early childhood. Therefor removing these bacteria always the best way to prevent such infections.","PeriodicalId":92912,"journal":{"name":"International journal of immunology and immunotherapy","volume":"19 10 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of immunology and immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJI.20210901.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating of some immunological responses among dental infection patients is essential in the clinical management of oral infection. Our study considered isolation of dental infection bacteria and quantitative evaluation of serum. IgA, IL-4, IL-7 and CD4 and CD8 molecules among dental plaque patients and control group. Oral bacteria from dental infection patients were isolated in appropriate media and diagnosed by biochemical tests and in vitro quantitative determination of serum IgA, IL-4, IL-7 and CD4 and CD8 molecules using ELISA technique. Single and mixed bacterial isolates were noted, mixed infection were (59.25%), the nature of bacteria was Gram positive cocci Streptococcus viridans, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactocacilli spps, in addition to Gram negative rods black- pigmented bacteria, Klebsilla pneumonia, and Esherishia coli. Serum IgA was higher in patients (368.8±182.5) ng\ml than in control group (319.92±79.26) ng\ml. Serum IL-4 was higher patients (285.33±86.12) pg/ml than in control group (257.7±94.14) pg\ml. Serum IL-7 was higher in control group (19.59±4.14) pg/ml than in dental plaque patients (17.98±3.18) pg /ml. Serum CD4 molecules was higher in control group (1.371±0.5242) ng/ml than in dental plaque patients (1.326±0.1292) ng/ml. Serum CD8 molecules shows non-significant elevation in patients group 0.5825±0.02717 (ng\ml) than in control group 0.51±0.01643 (ng\ml) P≤0.05. Mean of the CD4/CD8 ratio was higher 2.783±1.126 in control group while it was 2.355±0.24 in dental plaque patients, however the differences were non-significant (P≤0.05). The present study conclude that the bacteria isolated from dental infection patients were mixed more than single infection, there were non-significant elevation in IgA, IL-4, and CD8 in patients while IL-7 and CD4 was lower in patients group than in control group, while CD4\CD8 ratio were lower in patients group, these result reflect the fact that mucosal antigen induce systemic tolerance to some extent since these bacteria present in oral cavity in early childhood. Therefor removing these bacteria always the best way to prevent such infections.
牙齿感染患者的全身免疫反应
评估口腔感染患者的某些免疫反应在口腔感染的临床治疗中是必不可少的。本研究考虑了口腔感染细菌的分离和血清的定量评价。牙菌斑患者与对照组IgA、IL-4、IL-7及CD4、CD8分子的差异。在合适的培养基中分离口腔感染患者的口腔细菌,采用生化试验和ELISA技术体外定量检测血清IgA、IL-4、IL-7和CD4、CD8分子。除革兰氏阴性杆状黑色素菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希氏菌外,还检出单株和混合型分离菌,混合型感染占59.25%,主要为革兰氏阳性球菌、绿链球菌、化脓性链球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和乳杆菌。患者血清IgA(368.8±182.5)ng\ml高于对照组(319.92±79.26)ng\ml。血清IL-4(285.33±86.12)pg/ml高于对照组(257.7±94.14)pg/ml。对照组血清IL-7(19.59±4.14)pg/ml高于牙菌斑组(17.98±3.18)pg/ml。对照组血清CD4分子(1.371±0.5242)ng/ml高于牙菌斑组(1.326±0.1292)ng/ml。患者组血清CD8分子水平(0.5825±0.02717 (ng\ml))高于对照组(0.51±0.01643 (ng\ml), P≤0.05。对照组CD4/CD8比值(2.783±1.126)高于牙菌斑组(2.355±0.24),但差异无统计学意义(P≤0.05)。本研究认为,口腔感染患者分离出的细菌是混合的,而不是单一的感染,患者的IgA、IL-4和CD8均无明显升高,患者组的IL-7和CD4低于对照组,而患者组的CD4\CD8比值低于对照组,这些结果反映了这些细菌在儿童早期就存在于口腔中,黏膜抗原在一定程度上诱导了全身耐受。因此,清除这些细菌始终是防止此类感染的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信