Comparison of Different Techniques about Reservoir Capacity Calculation at Sami Soydam Sandalcık Dam

Hesham Alrayess, Asli Ulke, Salem S. Gharbia
{"title":"Comparison of Different Techniques about Reservoir Capacity Calculation at Sami Soydam Sandalcık Dam","authors":"Hesham Alrayess, Asli Ulke, Salem S. Gharbia","doi":"10.18466/CBAYARFBE.309272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reservoirs are designed to provide the balance between the flow brought by the river which is high variable in time and volume of water. The storage required on a river to meet a specific demand depends basically on three factors; the magnitude and the variability of the river, the size of the demand and the degree of reliability of this demand being met.  Several procedures have been proposed to estimate storage requirements. Critical period methods are those in which required reservoir capacity is equated to the difference between the water released from an initially full reservoir and the inflows for periods of low flow. In the presented study reservoir capacity-yield-reliability relationships are investigated for a single reservoir named Sami Soydam Sandalcik Dam. For this purpose, six design techniques (Mass Curve, Residual Mass Curve, Moran Probability Matrix Method, Hardison's method and Minimum flow approach) are used in determining reservoir capacity, monthly and annual mean flow data observed for a period between 1962-2013, of EIE-811 Sucati Flow Gauging Station on Dalaman River in West Mediterranean Basin in Turkey are used as case study. For 0% probability of failure, the highest reservoir capacity resulted for methods Mass Curve, Residual Mass Curve and Minimum flow approach at the range between 814.22 to 852.74*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 60% and at the range between 2043.4 to 2145.74*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 80% by using the monthly data. On the other hand when high value of probability of failure (5% and 10%) are used for estimation, the reservoir capacity values were resulted at the range between 612.36 to 1154.74*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 60% and at the range between 1443.42 to 2165.13*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 80% for Hardison's method. By using Moran Probability Matrix method, the reservoir capacity resulted 1280*10 6 m 3 and the interval was divided to 140*10 6 m 3 for annual data 52 years.","PeriodicalId":9652,"journal":{"name":"Celal Bayar Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Celal Bayar Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18466/CBAYARFBE.309272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Reservoirs are designed to provide the balance between the flow brought by the river which is high variable in time and volume of water. The storage required on a river to meet a specific demand depends basically on three factors; the magnitude and the variability of the river, the size of the demand and the degree of reliability of this demand being met.  Several procedures have been proposed to estimate storage requirements. Critical period methods are those in which required reservoir capacity is equated to the difference between the water released from an initially full reservoir and the inflows for periods of low flow. In the presented study reservoir capacity-yield-reliability relationships are investigated for a single reservoir named Sami Soydam Sandalcik Dam. For this purpose, six design techniques (Mass Curve, Residual Mass Curve, Moran Probability Matrix Method, Hardison's method and Minimum flow approach) are used in determining reservoir capacity, monthly and annual mean flow data observed for a period between 1962-2013, of EIE-811 Sucati Flow Gauging Station on Dalaman River in West Mediterranean Basin in Turkey are used as case study. For 0% probability of failure, the highest reservoir capacity resulted for methods Mass Curve, Residual Mass Curve and Minimum flow approach at the range between 814.22 to 852.74*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 60% and at the range between 2043.4 to 2145.74*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 80% by using the monthly data. On the other hand when high value of probability of failure (5% and 10%) are used for estimation, the reservoir capacity values were resulted at the range between 612.36 to 1154.74*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 60% and at the range between 1443.42 to 2165.13*10 6 m 3 for draft equal 80% for Hardison's method. By using Moran Probability Matrix method, the reservoir capacity resulted 1280*10 6 m 3 and the interval was divided to 140*10 6 m 3 for annual data 52 years.
Sami Soydam Sandalcık大坝库容计算不同技术的比较
水库的设计是为了在时间和水量变化很大的河流带来的流量之间提供平衡。满足特定需求所需的河流储存量基本上取决于三个因素;河流的大小和可变性,需求的大小以及满足这种需求的可靠程度。提出了几种估计储存需求的程序。关键时期方法是指所需的水库容量等于最初满水库释放的水与低流量时期流入的水之间的差。本文以Sami Soydam Sandalcik大坝为研究对象,研究了单水库的库容-产-信关系。为此,采用质量曲线、剩余质量曲线、Moran概率矩阵法、Hardison法和最小流量法等6种设计方法确定水库容量,并以土耳其西地中海盆地Dalaman河EIE-811 Sucati流量测站1962-2013年逐月和年平均流量数据为例进行研究。当失效概率为0%时,利用月数据,质量曲线法、剩余质量曲线法和最小流量法在814.22 ~ 852.74 × 10.6 m³(吃水为60%)和2043.4 ~ 2145.74 × 10.6 m³(吃水为80%)范围内的库容最大。另一方面,当采用较高的失效概率值(5%和10%)进行估算时,采用哈迪森法,在吃水等于60%时,库容值在612.36 ~ 1154.74 × 10.6 m³之间,在吃水等于80%时,库容值在1443.42 ~ 2165.13 × 10.6 m³之间。利用Moran概率矩阵法,对52年的年数据进行库容划分,得到库容1280* 106m3,区间划分为140* 106m3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信