P. Kitchin, J. L. Paramio-Salcines, S. Darcy, G. Walters
{"title":"Exploring the accessibility of sport stadia for people with disability: towards the development of a Stadium Accessibility Scale (SAS)","authors":"P. Kitchin, J. L. Paramio-Salcines, S. Darcy, G. Walters","doi":"10.1108/sbm-05-2021-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to synthesise existing literature on sports stadia, spectators with disabilities (SwD) and accessibility to identify themes and to highlight the gaps in the literature. This review subsequently develops two propositions that will enable research in this emerging area to further develop.Design/methodology/approachThe research was guided by two research questions: First, what does the peer reviewed evidence tell us about SwD and the accessibility of sporting stadia?; Second, how can this information be used to develop a Stadium Accessibility Scale (SAS)? The authors conducted a rapid review of the literature across three databases that identified 34 papers for synthesis.FindingsThe synthesis revealed three research themes: a focus on legislative compliance, the need to enhance resources (both physical and human) and research that focusses on moving beyond the stadium experience. The latter can be subdivided into two streams – studies that look at accessibility as a social legacy of major events and studies that seek to understand the whole journey that SwD's must make to attend sport events.Research limitations/implicationsThe study makes two key recommendations. The first is to encourage further research aligned to the HOPES framework (Paramio-Salcines et al., 2016) that explicitly recognises the importance of understanding the broader approach to the customer experience. The second is the need for the development and validation of a reliable SAS.Originality/valueGreater accessibility provides a foundation for inclusive environments in sport. The findings are relevant for all stakeholders in sport as universal accessibility benefits more than people with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":45818,"journal":{"name":"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-05-2021-0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to synthesise existing literature on sports stadia, spectators with disabilities (SwD) and accessibility to identify themes and to highlight the gaps in the literature. This review subsequently develops two propositions that will enable research in this emerging area to further develop.Design/methodology/approachThe research was guided by two research questions: First, what does the peer reviewed evidence tell us about SwD and the accessibility of sporting stadia?; Second, how can this information be used to develop a Stadium Accessibility Scale (SAS)? The authors conducted a rapid review of the literature across three databases that identified 34 papers for synthesis.FindingsThe synthesis revealed three research themes: a focus on legislative compliance, the need to enhance resources (both physical and human) and research that focusses on moving beyond the stadium experience. The latter can be subdivided into two streams – studies that look at accessibility as a social legacy of major events and studies that seek to understand the whole journey that SwD's must make to attend sport events.Research limitations/implicationsThe study makes two key recommendations. The first is to encourage further research aligned to the HOPES framework (Paramio-Salcines et al., 2016) that explicitly recognises the importance of understanding the broader approach to the customer experience. The second is the need for the development and validation of a reliable SAS.Originality/valueGreater accessibility provides a foundation for inclusive environments in sport. The findings are relevant for all stakeholders in sport as universal accessibility benefits more than people with disabilities.
本文的目的是综合现有的关于体育场馆,残疾观众(SwD)和无障碍的文献,以确定主题并突出文献中的差距。这篇综述随后提出了两个命题,这将使这一新兴领域的研究得到进一步发展。设计/方法/方法本研究以两个研究问题为指导:第一,经同行评审的证据对社会福利署和体育场馆的无障碍环境有何启示?其次,如何使用这些信息来开发体育场无障碍量表(SAS)?作者对三个数据库中的文献进行了快速审查,确定了34篇论文用于合成。研究结果综合揭示了三个研究主题:关注立法合规,需要加强资源(物理和人力),以及关注超越体育场体验的研究。后者可细分为两类研究,一类是将无障碍环境视为大型活动的社会遗产,另一类是旨在了解社署人士出席体育赛事的整个过程。研究的局限性/意义该研究提出了两个关键建议。首先是鼓励进一步研究符合希望框架(Paramio-Salcines et al., 2016),明确认识到理解更广泛的客户体验方法的重要性。第二是需要开发和验证可靠的SAS。原创性/价值更大的可达性为体育包容性环境提供了基础。这些发现与体育的所有利益攸关方都相关,因为普遍无障碍比残疾人受益更多。