Marxian Ecology, East and West: Joseph Needham and a Non-Eurocentric View of the Origins of China’s Ecological Civilization

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
John Bellamy Foster
{"title":"Marxian Ecology, East and West: Joseph Needham and a Non-Eurocentric View of the Origins of China’s Ecological Civilization","authors":"John Bellamy Foster","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2023.2207411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT What is referred to here as the Needham thesis, after Joseph Needham, author of Science and Civilization in China , points to the strong affinity in China for dialectical materialism, and through it to modern ecological science, arising from the parallel roots in organic materialism associated with ancient Epicureanism in the West (which influenced classical Marxism) and ancient Daoist and Confucian philosophies in China. This parallel development of organic materialism in Europe (where it was largely submerged in the dominant capitalist culture) and in China embodied in each case deep ecological conceptions. Hence, dialectical materialism, once it arrived in China, served to mediate between these organic traditions within the framework of modern materialist science. It was in this general context that the notion of ecological civilization, arising initially in the last years of the USSR, was carried forward to China, where it took on added meaning. China’s own peasant-based revolution has induced further ecological developments. As a result of this general convergence, and due to China’s reemergence on the world stage, ecological Marxism is now rapidly coevolving in both East and West.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"85 1","pages":"155 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2023.2207411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT What is referred to here as the Needham thesis, after Joseph Needham, author of Science and Civilization in China , points to the strong affinity in China for dialectical materialism, and through it to modern ecological science, arising from the parallel roots in organic materialism associated with ancient Epicureanism in the West (which influenced classical Marxism) and ancient Daoist and Confucian philosophies in China. This parallel development of organic materialism in Europe (where it was largely submerged in the dominant capitalist culture) and in China embodied in each case deep ecological conceptions. Hence, dialectical materialism, once it arrived in China, served to mediate between these organic traditions within the framework of modern materialist science. It was in this general context that the notion of ecological civilization, arising initially in the last years of the USSR, was carried forward to China, where it took on added meaning. China’s own peasant-based revolution has induced further ecological developments. As a result of this general convergence, and due to China’s reemergence on the world stage, ecological Marxism is now rapidly coevolving in both East and West.
马克思主义生态学,东方与西方:李约瑟与中国生态文明起源的非欧洲中心观
以《中国科学与文明》的作者李约瑟的名字命名的李约瑟命题,指出中国对辩证唯物主义有着强烈的亲和力,并通过它与现代生态科学联系在一起,这源于西方古代伊壁鸠鲁主义(影响了古典马克思主义)和中国古代道家和儒家哲学的有机唯物主义的平行根源。有机唯物主义在欧洲(它在很大程度上被淹没在占主导地位的资本主义文化中)和中国的平行发展,在每个案例中都体现了深刻的生态观念。因此,辩证唯物主义一到中国,就在现代唯物主义科学的框架内,在这些有机的传统之间起了调解的作用。正是在这样的大背景下,生态文明的概念,最初出现在苏联的最后几年,被发扬到中国,在那里它被赋予了更多的意义。中国自身以农民为基础的革命引发了进一步的生态发展。由于这种普遍趋同,以及中国在世界舞台上的重新崛起,生态马克思主义正在东方和西方迅速共同发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信