Comparison of Adverse Maternal Outcome in Early Onset Versus Delayed Onset Preeclampsia

Saba Jehangir, R. Salam, Nasreen Akhtar, Nimra Bashir, Sara Akram, Farzana Sabir, S. Saeed
{"title":"Comparison of Adverse Maternal Outcome in Early Onset Versus Delayed Onset Preeclampsia","authors":"Saba Jehangir, R. Salam, Nasreen Akhtar, Nimra Bashir, Sara Akram, Farzana Sabir, S. Saeed","doi":"10.53350/pjmhs2023176164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To determine the association of adverse maternal outcome with early onset preeclampsia than delayed onset preeclampsia. Study Design: Cohort study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Unit-II, DHQ Hospital, Mirpur, AJK from 30th December 2020 to 29th June 2021. Methodology: A total of 60 (30 early onset pre-eclampsia and 30 delayed onset pre-eclampsia) females of age 18-40 years with parity <5, presenting at gestational age >24 weeks were included. Patients with chronic or gestational diabetes (BSR>186mg/dl), chronic hypertension (BP≥140/90mmHg), cardiac disease (on medical record), multiple gestation (on ultrasound), abnormal placenta (abruption, previa, accrete, increta, percreta on ultrasound) were excluded. Females were evaluated for eclampsia (BP>160/100mmHg along with convulsions), DIC, HELLP syndrome and avascular tubular necrosis by using blood samples and ultrasound findings. Results: The adverse maternal outcome i.e. eclampsia was recorded in 11 (36.67%) in exposed group (early onset pre-eclampsia) versus 04 (13.33%) in unexposed group (delayed onset pre-eclampsia) (p= 0.053; relative risk = 2.75), acute tubular necrosis was recorded in 05 (16.67%) in exposed group (early onset pre-eclampsia) while 00 (0.0%) in unexposed group (delayed onset pre-eclampsia) (p = 0.099; relative risk = 11.00), DIC was recorded in 03 (10.0%) versus 00 (0.0%) respectively (p= 0.192; relative risk = 7.00) and HELLP syndrome in 06 (20.0%) versus 00 (0.0%) respectively (p = 0.076; relative risk = 13.0). Practical Implication: We recommend that a proper protocol should be designed in these high risk patients for antenatal monitoring and proper management plans in order to reduce the morbidity and mortality of the mother and fetus. Conclusion: This study concluded that adverse maternal outcome is higher in early onset preeclampsia as compared to delayed onset preeclampsia. Keywords: Preeclampsia, Adverse Maternal Outcome, Eclampsia.","PeriodicalId":19842,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023176164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine the association of adverse maternal outcome with early onset preeclampsia than delayed onset preeclampsia. Study Design: Cohort study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Unit-II, DHQ Hospital, Mirpur, AJK from 30th December 2020 to 29th June 2021. Methodology: A total of 60 (30 early onset pre-eclampsia and 30 delayed onset pre-eclampsia) females of age 18-40 years with parity <5, presenting at gestational age >24 weeks were included. Patients with chronic or gestational diabetes (BSR>186mg/dl), chronic hypertension (BP≥140/90mmHg), cardiac disease (on medical record), multiple gestation (on ultrasound), abnormal placenta (abruption, previa, accrete, increta, percreta on ultrasound) were excluded. Females were evaluated for eclampsia (BP>160/100mmHg along with convulsions), DIC, HELLP syndrome and avascular tubular necrosis by using blood samples and ultrasound findings. Results: The adverse maternal outcome i.e. eclampsia was recorded in 11 (36.67%) in exposed group (early onset pre-eclampsia) versus 04 (13.33%) in unexposed group (delayed onset pre-eclampsia) (p= 0.053; relative risk = 2.75), acute tubular necrosis was recorded in 05 (16.67%) in exposed group (early onset pre-eclampsia) while 00 (0.0%) in unexposed group (delayed onset pre-eclampsia) (p = 0.099; relative risk = 11.00), DIC was recorded in 03 (10.0%) versus 00 (0.0%) respectively (p= 0.192; relative risk = 7.00) and HELLP syndrome in 06 (20.0%) versus 00 (0.0%) respectively (p = 0.076; relative risk = 13.0). Practical Implication: We recommend that a proper protocol should be designed in these high risk patients for antenatal monitoring and proper management plans in order to reduce the morbidity and mortality of the mother and fetus. Conclusion: This study concluded that adverse maternal outcome is higher in early onset preeclampsia as compared to delayed onset preeclampsia. Keywords: Preeclampsia, Adverse Maternal Outcome, Eclampsia.
早发型与迟发型子痫前期产妇不良结局的比较
目的:探讨早发型子痫前期孕妇不良结局与迟发性子痫前期孕妇的关系。研究设计:队列研究。研究地点和时间:2020年12月30日至2021年6月29日,AJK米尔普尔DHQ医院第二妇产科。方法:共纳入60例(30例早发型子痫前期和30例延迟发型子痫前期)女性,年龄18-40岁,胎次24周。排除慢性或妊娠期糖尿病(BSR bb0 186mg/dl)、慢性高血压(BP≥140/90mmHg)、心脏病(病史记录)、多胎妊娠(超声记录)、异常胎盘(超声记录)(早剥、前via、增生、增量、percreta)患者。通过血液样本和超声检查评估女性子痫(血压160/100mmHg伴惊厥)、DIC、HELLP综合征和无血管小管坏死。结果:暴露组(早发型子痫前期)发生子痫不良事件11例(36.67%),未暴露组(迟发型子痫前期)发生子痫不良事件04例(13.33%)(p= 0.053;相对危险度= 2.75),暴露组(早发型子痫前期)急性肾小管坏死05例(16.67%),未暴露组(晚发型子痫前期)急性肾小管坏死00例(0.0%)(p = 0.099;相对危险度= 11.00),DIC分别为03(10.0%)和00 (0.0%)(p= 0.192;相对危险度= 7.00)和HELLP综合征患者分别为06(20.0%)和00 (0.0%)(p = 0.076;相对危险度= 13.0)。实际意义:我们建议在这些高危患者中设计适当的方案进行产前监测和适当的管理计划,以降低母胎的发病率和死亡率。结论:本研究得出的结论是,与迟发性子痫前期相比,早发性子痫前期产妇的不良结局更高。关键词:子痫前期,产妇不良结局,子痫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信