Observation, parameterization and simulation of turbulent mixing in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea

M. Lilover, A. Stips
{"title":"Observation, parameterization and simulation of turbulent mixing in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea","authors":"M. Lilover, A. Stips","doi":"10.1109/BALTIC.2008.4625524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three time series of shear microstructure measurements (duration 13, 24 and 14 h respectively) were performed in 3 different wind forcing regimes as well as in 3 different background density stratification and current velocity shear situations at the entrance to the Gulf of Finland, in July 1998. Vertical shear of current velocity was enhanced by near-inertial waves during the first (A1) and third (A3) time series. We compared a Richardson number based parameterization and an estimation using the two equation k-epsiv turbulence closure (General Ocean Turbulence Model, GOTM) with ldquomeasuredrdquo eddy diffusivities. For two out of the three time series eddy diffusivities calculated via a Richardson number parameterization and via simulation using the k-epsiv model agreed well with the experimental data. However, in the case of relatively high current velocity shear and weak background density stratification (time series A3) both applied methods resulted in a remarkable discrepancy against the measured eddy diffusivity. On the contrary, calculations with a new parameterization scheme, which considers the internal wave kinetic energy fitted well for all three time series. Similarly the modified k-epsiv simulations which considered the internal wave energy level better matched the measured profiles.","PeriodicalId":6307,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE/OES US/EU-Baltic International Symposium","volume":"138 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE/OES US/EU-Baltic International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2008.4625524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Three time series of shear microstructure measurements (duration 13, 24 and 14 h respectively) were performed in 3 different wind forcing regimes as well as in 3 different background density stratification and current velocity shear situations at the entrance to the Gulf of Finland, in July 1998. Vertical shear of current velocity was enhanced by near-inertial waves during the first (A1) and third (A3) time series. We compared a Richardson number based parameterization and an estimation using the two equation k-epsiv turbulence closure (General Ocean Turbulence Model, GOTM) with ldquomeasuredrdquo eddy diffusivities. For two out of the three time series eddy diffusivities calculated via a Richardson number parameterization and via simulation using the k-epsiv model agreed well with the experimental data. However, in the case of relatively high current velocity shear and weak background density stratification (time series A3) both applied methods resulted in a remarkable discrepancy against the measured eddy diffusivity. On the contrary, calculations with a new parameterization scheme, which considers the internal wave kinetic energy fitted well for all three time series. Similarly the modified k-epsiv simulations which considered the internal wave energy level better matched the measured profiles.
波罗的海芬兰湾湍流混合的观测、参数化和模拟
1998年7月,在芬兰湾入口处3种不同的风强迫状态以及3种不同的背景密度分层和当前速度切变情况下,进行了3个时间序列的切变微观结构测量(持续时间分别为13、24和14 h)。在第一(A1)和第三(A3)时间序列中,近惯性波增强了流速垂直切变。我们比较了基于Richardson数的参数化和使用两方程k-epsiv湍流闭合(一般海洋湍流模型,GOTM)的估计与ldququmeasurements的涡旋扩散系数。通过Richardson数参数化和k-epsiv模型模拟计算的三个时间序列中的两个涡动扩散率与实验数据吻合得很好。然而,在较高的流速切变和弱背景密度分层(时间序列A3)情况下,两种方法的测量结果与旋涡扩散系数存在显著差异。另一方面,考虑内波动能的参数化方法对三种时间序列的拟合效果较好。同样,考虑内波能级的修正k-epsiv模拟与实测剖面更吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信