Development of Cognitive Ability Test Instrument Based on Revision Bloom Taxonomy on Dynamic Electricity Materials For Students of Senior High School

Eka Nurmaya, A. Rusilowati, B. Astuti
{"title":"Development of Cognitive Ability Test Instrument Based on Revision Bloom Taxonomy on Dynamic Electricity Materials For Students of Senior High School","authors":"Eka Nurmaya, A. Rusilowati, B. Astuti","doi":"10.15294/physcomm.v6i2.37028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to develop a cognitive ability test instrument based on Bloom's taxonomy revision. The test instrument covers the cognitive domains C1 (remembering), C2 (understanding), C3 (applying), C4 (analyzing), C5 (evaluating), and C6 (creating). The research was carried out using research and development methods using a 4-D development model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The research data obtained is analyzed quantitatively to determine the validity, discriminatory power, reliability, and level of difficulty of the cognitive ability test instrument. Results of research based on the analysis of the validity test showed that the test instrument was declared valid by material experts and evaluation experts with an average value of 92.65. Based on the analysis of the validity of the item validity test, there are two invalid questions, namely questions number 2 and 10. Based on the results of analyzing differentiating power, the results of question number 20 are obtained, 64 for essay questions. Based on the analysis of the level of difficulty, the results showed that the test instrument was at 5% percent of the questions at the difficulty level, 20% at the sufficient level, 70% at the medium level, and 5% at the easy level. Overall, the test instrument is valid, reliable, has good discriminating power, and has varying levels of difficulty.","PeriodicalId":31790,"journal":{"name":"Physics Communication","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v6i2.37028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to develop a cognitive ability test instrument based on Bloom's taxonomy revision. The test instrument covers the cognitive domains C1 (remembering), C2 (understanding), C3 (applying), C4 (analyzing), C5 (evaluating), and C6 (creating). The research was carried out using research and development methods using a 4-D development model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The research data obtained is analyzed quantitatively to determine the validity, discriminatory power, reliability, and level of difficulty of the cognitive ability test instrument. Results of research based on the analysis of the validity test showed that the test instrument was declared valid by material experts and evaluation experts with an average value of 92.65. Based on the analysis of the validity of the item validity test, there are two invalid questions, namely questions number 2 and 10. Based on the results of analyzing differentiating power, the results of question number 20 are obtained, 64 for essay questions. Based on the analysis of the level of difficulty, the results showed that the test instrument was at 5% percent of the questions at the difficulty level, 20% at the sufficient level, 70% at the medium level, and 5% at the easy level. Overall, the test instrument is valid, reliable, has good discriminating power, and has varying levels of difficulty.
基于修订Bloom分类法的高中学生动态电材料认知能力测试工具的研制
本研究旨在开发一种基于Bloom分类法修正的认知能力测试工具。测试工具涵盖了认知领域C1(记忆),C2(理解),C3(应用),C4(分析),C5(评估)和C6(创造)。本研究采用4-D开发模型(定义、设计、开发、传播)的研发方法进行。对获得的研究数据进行定量分析,确定认知能力测试工具的效度、辨析力、信度和难易程度。基于效度检验分析的研究结果表明,材料专家和评价专家的平均效度为92.65。根据项目效度测试的效度分析,有两个无效问题,即问题2和问题10。根据微分力分析的结果,得到第20题的结果,论述题的结果为64题。通过对难度等级的分析,结果显示,测试仪器在难度等级中占题数的5%,在充分等级中占题数的20%,在中等等级中占题数的70%,在易等级中占题数的5%。总体而言,该测试仪器有效、可靠,具有良好的判别能力,并具有不同程度的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信