{"title":"The Agrarian Question in the Views of N. Kh. Bunge (to the 200th Anniversary of his Birthday)","authors":"D. Stozhko, K. Stozhko","doi":"10.15507/2409-630x.060.019.202301.076-086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. 2023 marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of N. Kh. Bunge, an outstanding Russian scientist, economist, public figure and statesman. His views, especially on the agrarian question, are still poorly understood. The aim of the study is to analyze and evaluate the views of N. Kh. Bunge on the agrarian issue and to reveal their humanistic nature.\n\nMaterials and Methods. The study used methods of analysis, synthesis, generalizations and axiology, as well as historical-retrospective, historical-genetic and hermeneutical, program-targeted and structural-functional methods for studying problematic issues in the history of economic science. The study is based on primary sources: the writings of N. Kh. Bunge himself and the works of his contemporaries.\n\nResults. Among the most significant ideas in the field of posing and solving the agrarian issue of N. Kh. Bunge, his approaches to the issues of land ownership and land use, migration (settlement) processes, the development of peasant self-government, the development of rental, tax and financial-credit relations are identified and disclosed. The multidimensional and at the same time contradictory nature of the views of N. Kh. Bunge in matters of domestic economic policy were revealed. The conclusion is made about the humanistic orientation of the scientific heritage of the scientist and the need for its further more detailed study in the context of a new social reality.\n\nDiscussion and Conclusion. Specific approaches of Russian historiography to the study of the works of N. Kh. Bunge in the pre-revolutionary period (A. N. Zak, I. I. Levin, A. A. Mikulin, M. N. Sobolev, M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky and others) and the growing interest in his political and economic views in the 21st century. An assessment is given to the debatable thesis about the characterization of the views of N. Kh. Bunge as being “between historicism and liberalism” (J. Zweinert).","PeriodicalId":47868,"journal":{"name":"Economic History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2409-630x.060.019.202301.076-086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction. 2023 marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of N. Kh. Bunge, an outstanding Russian scientist, economist, public figure and statesman. His views, especially on the agrarian question, are still poorly understood. The aim of the study is to analyze and evaluate the views of N. Kh. Bunge on the agrarian issue and to reveal their humanistic nature.
Materials and Methods. The study used methods of analysis, synthesis, generalizations and axiology, as well as historical-retrospective, historical-genetic and hermeneutical, program-targeted and structural-functional methods for studying problematic issues in the history of economic science. The study is based on primary sources: the writings of N. Kh. Bunge himself and the works of his contemporaries.
Results. Among the most significant ideas in the field of posing and solving the agrarian issue of N. Kh. Bunge, his approaches to the issues of land ownership and land use, migration (settlement) processes, the development of peasant self-government, the development of rental, tax and financial-credit relations are identified and disclosed. The multidimensional and at the same time contradictory nature of the views of N. Kh. Bunge in matters of domestic economic policy were revealed. The conclusion is made about the humanistic orientation of the scientific heritage of the scientist and the need for its further more detailed study in the context of a new social reality.
Discussion and Conclusion. Specific approaches of Russian historiography to the study of the works of N. Kh. Bunge in the pre-revolutionary period (A. N. Zak, I. I. Levin, A. A. Mikulin, M. N. Sobolev, M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky and others) and the growing interest in his political and economic views in the 21st century. An assessment is given to the debatable thesis about the characterization of the views of N. Kh. Bunge as being “between historicism and liberalism” (J. Zweinert).
2023年是N. Kh诞辰200周年。邦吉,杰出的俄罗斯科学家、经济学家、公众人物和政治家。他的观点,特别是关于土地问题的观点,至今仍不为人所知。本研究的目的是分析和评价N. Kh.的观点。以土地问题为切入点,揭示其人文本质。材料与方法。本研究采用了分析、综合、概括和价值论的方法,以及历史-回顾、历史-遗传和解释学、方案目标和结构-功能的方法来研究经济科学史中的问题。这项研究是基于主要来源:N. Kh.的著作。邦吉本人和他同时代的作品。在提出和解决北达科他州土地问题的领域中,最重要的思想之一是。他对土地所有权和土地使用、迁移(定居)过程、农民自治的发展、租赁、税收和金融信贷关系的发展等问题的研究方法得到了确认和披露。N. Kh.的观点是多维的,同时又是矛盾的。国内经济政策方面的分歧显露出来。最后,总结了科学家科学遗产的人文取向,以及在新的社会现实背景下对其进行进一步细致研究的必要性。讨论与结论。俄国史学研究N. Kh.著作的具体方法。革命前的邦格(A. N. Zak, I. I. Levin, A. A. Mikulin, M. N. Sobolev, M. I. Tugan-Baranovsky等人)以及21世纪对他的政治和经济观点日益增长的兴趣。对有争议的关于N. Kh.观点的表征的论文进行了评价。邦吉被认为是“介于历史决定论和自由主义之间”(J.兹魏纳特)。
期刊介绍:
The Economic History Review is published quarterly and each volume contains over 800 pages. It is an invaluable source of information and is available free to members of the Economic History Society. Publishing reviews of books, periodicals and information technology, The Review will keep anyone interested in economic and social history abreast of current developments in the subject. It aims at broad coverage of themes of economic and social change, including the intellectual, political and cultural implications of these changes.