Market-based governance within the walls of the state: the state guarantee model as a market-based governance mode in Danish transport infrastructure

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
L. Christensen
{"title":"Market-based governance within the walls of the state: the state guarantee model as a market-based governance mode in Danish transport infrastructure","authors":"L. Christensen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v54i1.130602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contributes to the Danish literature on public governance by presenting, analyzing and conceptualizing a widespread yet overlooked governance mode that will become even more influential in the future infrastructure policy. The article explores: How has the state guarantee model (SGM) developed into a market-based governance mode in the Danish infrastructure governance in the transport area, which is dominated by a hierarchal governance paradigm? The article is based on a qualitative case study of all infrastructure projects with SGM using the concept of governance paradigms adapted to the area of infrastructure. The article shows that SGM is invented to realize mega-projects outside the bureaucratic governance mode. The development from governance model to governance mode takes place as new public companies emerge and contribute with expertise and funding to the existing infrastructure network based on a bureaucratic governance mode. Over time, the model is further developed for public transport and medium-sized infrastructure projects in hybrid models that lead to changes in the norms for user charges in the hierarchal governance paradigm. Over time, the SGM reduces political control over existing and new SGM projects.","PeriodicalId":40761,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Politica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v54i1.130602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contributes to the Danish literature on public governance by presenting, analyzing and conceptualizing a widespread yet overlooked governance mode that will become even more influential in the future infrastructure policy. The article explores: How has the state guarantee model (SGM) developed into a market-based governance mode in the Danish infrastructure governance in the transport area, which is dominated by a hierarchal governance paradigm? The article is based on a qualitative case study of all infrastructure projects with SGM using the concept of governance paradigms adapted to the area of infrastructure. The article shows that SGM is invented to realize mega-projects outside the bureaucratic governance mode. The development from governance model to governance mode takes place as new public companies emerge and contribute with expertise and funding to the existing infrastructure network based on a bureaucratic governance mode. Over time, the model is further developed for public transport and medium-sized infrastructure projects in hybrid models that lead to changes in the norms for user charges in the hierarchal governance paradigm. Over time, the SGM reduces political control over existing and new SGM projects.
国家内部的市场治理:国家担保模式作为丹麦交通基础设施的市场治理模式
这篇文章通过提出、分析和概念化一种广泛但被忽视的治理模式,为丹麦的公共治理文献做出了贡献,这种模式将对未来的基础设施政策产生更大的影响。本文探讨:在以等级治理范式为主导的丹麦交通领域基础设施治理中,国家保障模式(SGM)是如何发展成为基于市场的治理模式的?本文基于对所有基础设施项目的定性案例研究,使用了适用于基础设施领域的治理范式概念。文章表明,SGM是为了在官僚治理模式之外实现大型项目而发明的。从治理模型到治理模式的发展是随着新的上市公司的出现而发生的,它们为基于官僚治理模式的现有基础设施网络提供专业知识和资金。随着时间的推移,该模型在公共交通和中型基础设施项目的混合模型中得到进一步发展,从而导致分层治理范式中用户收费规范的变化。随着时间的推移,SGM减少了对现有和新SGM项目的政治控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofia Politica
Filosofia Politica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信