Beyond Urgenda : The role of the ECHR and judgments of the ECtHR in Dutch environmental and climate litigation

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
J. Krommendijk
{"title":"Beyond\n Urgenda\n : The role of the ECHR and judgments of the ECtHR in Dutch environmental and climate litigation","authors":"J. Krommendijk","doi":"10.1111/reel.12405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human rights have been championed as the new frontier in environmental and climate change litigation, especially since the Dutch Urgenda case. However, little is known about whether this alleged turn to rights is really happening beyond a few high- profile judgments. This article examines how and when courts have relied on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in environmental cases in the Netherlands since 2016. In doing so, it will show the broad potential and wide range of environmental cases in which rights are used. Rights talk is at the same time frequently overlooked or avoided by the parties and the courts, partly because the added value is limited in the light of specific national (EU- inspired) statutory provisions. To date, the actual impact of the EC(t)HR has been rather minimal beyond Urgenda , partly because of the limitations in the ECHR. This articles sketches avenues for further (empirical) research.","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Human rights have been championed as the new frontier in environmental and climate change litigation, especially since the Dutch Urgenda case. However, little is known about whether this alleged turn to rights is really happening beyond a few high- profile judgments. This article examines how and when courts have relied on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in environmental cases in the Netherlands since 2016. In doing so, it will show the broad potential and wide range of environmental cases in which rights are used. Rights talk is at the same time frequently overlooked or avoided by the parties and the courts, partly because the added value is limited in the light of specific national (EU- inspired) statutory provisions. To date, the actual impact of the EC(t)HR has been rather minimal beyond Urgenda , partly because of the limitations in the ECHR. This articles sketches avenues for further (empirical) research.
超越紧急事务:欧洲人权法院的作用和欧洲人权法院在荷兰环境和气候诉讼中的判决
人权一直被视为环境和气候变化诉讼的新前沿,尤其是自荷兰紧急议程案以来。然而,除了一些高调的判决外,人们对所谓的人权转向是否真的发生知之甚少。本文研究了自2016年以来荷兰法院在环境案件中如何以及何时依赖《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR)和欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)的判例法。在这样做时,它将显示使用权利的广泛潜力和范围广泛的环境案例。与此同时,权利对话经常被当事人和法院忽视或回避,部分原因是其附加价值受到特定国家(受欧盟启发)法律规定的限制。迄今为止,除了《紧急议程》之外,《欧洲人权公约》的实际影响相当小,部分原因是《欧洲人权公约》的局限性。这篇文章概述了进一步(实证)研究的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信