Formal Verification of Usage Control Models: A Case Study of UseCON Using TLA+

CoRR Pub Date : 2018-06-25 DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.272.5
Antonios Gouglidis, Christos Grompanopoulos, Anastasia Mavridou
{"title":"Formal Verification of Usage Control Models: A Case Study of UseCON Using TLA+","authors":"Antonios Gouglidis, Christos Grompanopoulos, Anastasia Mavridou","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.272.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usage control models provide an integration of access control, digital rights, and trust management. To achieve this integration, usage control models support additional concepts such as attribute mutability and continuity of decision. However, these concepts may introduce an additional level of complexity to the underlying model, rendering its definition a cumbersome and prone to errors process. Applying a formal verification technique allows for a rigorous analysis of the interactions amongst the components, and thus for formal guarantees in respect of the correctness of a model. In this paper, we elaborate on a case study, where we express the high-level functional model of the UseCON usage control model in the TLA+ formal specification language, and verify its correctness for <=12 uses in both of its supporting authorisation models.","PeriodicalId":10720,"journal":{"name":"CoRR","volume":"23 1","pages":"52-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoRR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.272.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Usage control models provide an integration of access control, digital rights, and trust management. To achieve this integration, usage control models support additional concepts such as attribute mutability and continuity of decision. However, these concepts may introduce an additional level of complexity to the underlying model, rendering its definition a cumbersome and prone to errors process. Applying a formal verification technique allows for a rigorous analysis of the interactions amongst the components, and thus for formal guarantees in respect of the correctness of a model. In this paper, we elaborate on a case study, where we express the high-level functional model of the UseCON usage control model in the TLA+ formal specification language, and verify its correctness for <=12 uses in both of its supporting authorisation models.
使用控制模型的形式化验证:以使用TLA+的UseCON为例
使用控制模型提供了访问控制、数字权限和信任管理的集成。为了实现这种集成,使用控制模型支持诸如属性可变性和决策连续性之类的附加概念。然而,这些概念可能会给底层模型带来额外的复杂性,使其定义成为一个繁琐且容易出错的过程。应用形式化验证技术可以对组件之间的交互进行严格的分析,从而对模型的正确性进行形式化保证。在本文中,我们详细阐述了一个案例研究,其中我们用TLA+正式规范语言表达了UseCON使用控制模型的高级功能模型,并验证了其在两种支持授权模型中<=12使用的正确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信