Selection of breeds, strains and individual pigs for prolificacy.

C. Legault
{"title":"Selection of breeds, strains and individual pigs for prolificacy.","authors":"C. Legault","doi":"10.1530/biosciprocs.12.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prolificacy, defined as litter size at birth, is currently considered to be the most important component of sow productivity. However, in spite of a spectacular increase in productivity due to management advances, litter size at birth has remained constant for the past 20 years. This situation seems to question the long-term efficiency of the classical methods of genetic improvement such as within-herd selection and crossbreeding between European or American breeds. Some recent developments and research results suggest that one can be optimistic about the possibilities of increasing litter size in the near future. A survey of available breeds world-wide illustrates the important differences in average litter size (5-15 piglets), embryo mortality (15-40%) and heterosis (ranging from 5 to over 30%) on litter size. In particular the high prolificacy of some Chinese breeds can be used to speed up gentic progress in improving litter size either through systematic 3-way (3-4 additional piglets per litter in the F1 compared with European breeds) or 4-way crosses with Western breeds, or by developing composite lines selected for heritable traits such as growth rate and backfat thickness. The efficiency of this system might be improved by combining Chinese breeds with 'hyperprolific' western strains. When using Chinese breeds, special attention should be paid to the choice of the terminal boar, which should be as lean as possible, in order to produce acceptable carcasses for sale. Another potential solution would be to use modern computerized recording systems to detect extreme individuals and then to apply a strong selection intensity. Using this approach, it is then possible to develop a gene pool for prolificacy. Results obtained in France, Great Britain and Australia are encouraging. The expected progress is about 0.5 piglets per litter when strain selection is limited to one sex and about 1 piglet when it includes both sexes. Moreover, using crossbreeding, the heterosis effect seems to be cumulated with the genetic changes mentioned above. The computer can also be an aid in eliminating chromosomal translocations responsible for a reduction in prolificacy ranging from 5 to 50%.","PeriodicalId":16956,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement","volume":"42 1","pages":"151-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/biosciprocs.12.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Prolificacy, defined as litter size at birth, is currently considered to be the most important component of sow productivity. However, in spite of a spectacular increase in productivity due to management advances, litter size at birth has remained constant for the past 20 years. This situation seems to question the long-term efficiency of the classical methods of genetic improvement such as within-herd selection and crossbreeding between European or American breeds. Some recent developments and research results suggest that one can be optimistic about the possibilities of increasing litter size in the near future. A survey of available breeds world-wide illustrates the important differences in average litter size (5-15 piglets), embryo mortality (15-40%) and heterosis (ranging from 5 to over 30%) on litter size. In particular the high prolificacy of some Chinese breeds can be used to speed up gentic progress in improving litter size either through systematic 3-way (3-4 additional piglets per litter in the F1 compared with European breeds) or 4-way crosses with Western breeds, or by developing composite lines selected for heritable traits such as growth rate and backfat thickness. The efficiency of this system might be improved by combining Chinese breeds with 'hyperprolific' western strains. When using Chinese breeds, special attention should be paid to the choice of the terminal boar, which should be as lean as possible, in order to produce acceptable carcasses for sale. Another potential solution would be to use modern computerized recording systems to detect extreme individuals and then to apply a strong selection intensity. Using this approach, it is then possible to develop a gene pool for prolificacy. Results obtained in France, Great Britain and Australia are encouraging. The expected progress is about 0.5 piglets per litter when strain selection is limited to one sex and about 1 piglet when it includes both sexes. Moreover, using crossbreeding, the heterosis effect seems to be cumulated with the genetic changes mentioned above. The computer can also be an aid in eliminating chromosomal translocations responsible for a reduction in prolificacy ranging from 5 to 50%.
选择品种、品系和单株生猪的繁殖能力。
繁殖能力,定义为出生时的窝仔数,目前被认为是母猪生产能力的最重要组成部分。然而,尽管由于管理的进步,生产力有了惊人的提高,但在过去的20年里,出生时的产仔数一直保持不变。这种情况似乎对传统的遗传改良方法的长期有效性提出了质疑,例如群内选择和欧洲或美洲品种之间的杂交。最近的一些发展和研究结果表明,人们可以对不久的将来产仔数增加的可能性持乐观态度。对世界各地现有品种的调查表明,平均产仔数(5-15头仔猪)、胚胎死亡率(15-40%)和产仔数的杂种优势(从5%到30%以上)存在重要差异。特别是,一些中国品种的高繁殖力可以通过系统的三向杂交(与欧洲品种相比,F1每窝增加3-4头仔猪)或与西方品种的四向杂交,或通过选育具有生长速度和背膘厚度等遗传性状的复合系,来加速提高产仔数的遗传进展。通过将中国品种与“高产”的西方品种相结合,可以提高该系统的效率。在使用中国品种时,应特别注意选择终末公猪,应尽可能瘦,以便生产可接受的胴体供销售。另一个可能的解决方案是使用现代计算机记录系统来检测极端的个体,然后施加强大的选择强度。利用这种方法,就有可能开发出一个繁殖基因库。在法国、英国和澳大利亚取得的结果令人鼓舞。当品系选择仅限于一种性别时,预期的进展是每窝约0.5头仔猪,当包括两性时,预期的进展是每窝约1头仔猪。此外,通过杂交育种,杂种优势效应似乎是随着上述遗传变化而积累的。计算机也可以作为消除染色体易位的辅助工具,这些染色体易位会导致细胞增殖能力降低5%到50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信