Comprehensive Evaluation of High-Resolution Satellite Precipitation Products over the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Using the New Ground Observation Network

Remote. Sens. Pub Date : 2023-07-02 DOI:10.3390/rs15133381
Zhaofei Liu
{"title":"Comprehensive Evaluation of High-Resolution Satellite Precipitation Products over the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Using the New Ground Observation Network","authors":"Zhaofei Liu","doi":"10.3390/rs15133381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Satellite precipitation products (SPPs) have been widely evaluated at regional scales. However, there have been few quantitative comprehensive evaluations of SPPs using multiple indices. Ten high-resolution SPPs were quantitatively and comprehensively evaluated from precipitation occurrence and series indices using an improved rank score (RS) method in the data-scarce Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP). The new observation network, along with a number of national basic stations, was applied for SPP evaluation to obtain more reliable results. The results showed that the GPM and MSWEP showed the strongest overall performance, with an RS value of 0.75. CHIRPS and GPM had the strongest performance at measuring precipitation occurrence (RS = 0.92) and series (RS = 0.75), respectively. The optimal SPPs varied in evaluation indices, but also concentrated in the MSWEP, GPM, and CHIRPS. The bias of SPPs was markedly in the QTP, with relative error generally between −80% and 80%. In general, most SPPs showed the ability to detect precipitation occurrence. However, the SPPs showed relatively weak performance at measuring precipitation series. The mean Kling–Gupta efficiency of all stations was <0.50 for each SPP. The SPPs showed better performance in monsoon-affected regions, which mainly include the Yangtze, Yellow, Nu–Salween, Lancang–Mekong, Yarlung Zangbo–Bramaputra, and Ganges river basins. Performance was relatively poor in the westerly circulation areas, which mainly include the Tarim, Indus, and QTP inland river basins. The performance of SPPs showed a seasonal pattern during the year for most occurrence indices. The performance of SPPs in different periods was opposite in different indices. Therefore, multiple indices representing different characteristics are recommended for the evaluation of SPPs to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result. Overall, SPP measurement over the QTP needs further improvement, especially with regard to measuring precipitation series. The proposed improved RS method can also potentially be applied for comprehensive evaluation of other products and models.","PeriodicalId":20944,"journal":{"name":"Remote. Sens.","volume":"8 1","pages":"3381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote. Sens.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15133381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Satellite precipitation products (SPPs) have been widely evaluated at regional scales. However, there have been few quantitative comprehensive evaluations of SPPs using multiple indices. Ten high-resolution SPPs were quantitatively and comprehensively evaluated from precipitation occurrence and series indices using an improved rank score (RS) method in the data-scarce Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau (QTP). The new observation network, along with a number of national basic stations, was applied for SPP evaluation to obtain more reliable results. The results showed that the GPM and MSWEP showed the strongest overall performance, with an RS value of 0.75. CHIRPS and GPM had the strongest performance at measuring precipitation occurrence (RS = 0.92) and series (RS = 0.75), respectively. The optimal SPPs varied in evaluation indices, but also concentrated in the MSWEP, GPM, and CHIRPS. The bias of SPPs was markedly in the QTP, with relative error generally between −80% and 80%. In general, most SPPs showed the ability to detect precipitation occurrence. However, the SPPs showed relatively weak performance at measuring precipitation series. The mean Kling–Gupta efficiency of all stations was <0.50 for each SPP. The SPPs showed better performance in monsoon-affected regions, which mainly include the Yangtze, Yellow, Nu–Salween, Lancang–Mekong, Yarlung Zangbo–Bramaputra, and Ganges river basins. Performance was relatively poor in the westerly circulation areas, which mainly include the Tarim, Indus, and QTP inland river basins. The performance of SPPs showed a seasonal pattern during the year for most occurrence indices. The performance of SPPs in different periods was opposite in different indices. Therefore, multiple indices representing different characteristics are recommended for the evaluation of SPPs to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result. Overall, SPP measurement over the QTP needs further improvement, especially with regard to measuring precipitation series. The proposed improved RS method can also potentially be applied for comprehensive evaluation of other products and models.
基于新地面观测网的青藏高原高分辨率卫星降水产品综合评价
卫星降水产品在区域尺度上得到了广泛的评价。然而,利用多指标对spp进行定量综合评价的研究较少。利用改进的等级评分(RS)方法,从降水发生和序列指数两方面对青藏高原10个高分辨率spp进行了定量综合评价。为了获得更可靠的结果,新的观测网与一些国家基本台站一起应用于SPP评价。结果表明,GPM和MSWEP的综合表现最强,RS值为0.75。CHIRPS和GPM在降水发生(RS = 0.92)和序列(RS = 0.75)上表现最好。最佳SPPs评价指标各不相同,但均集中在MSWEP、GPM和CHIRPS。在QTP中,spp的偏差明显,相对误差一般在- 80%到80%之间。总体而言,大多数spp具有探测降水发生的能力。然而,SPPs在测量降水序列方面表现出相对较弱的性能。各SPP站点的平均klinggupta效率均<0.50,SPP在受季风影响的长江、黄河、怒江、澜沧江-湄公河、雅鲁藏布江-雅鲁藏布江和恒河流域表现较好。西风环流区表现相对较差,主要包括塔里木、印度河和QTP内陆河流域。在大多数发生指数中,SPPs的表现在年内表现出季节性。不同时期spp在不同指数中的表现相反。因此,建议采用代表不同特征的多个指标对spp进行评价,以获得综合评价结果。总体而言,青藏高原SPP的测量需要进一步改进,特别是在测量降水序列方面。本文提出的改进RS方法也可以应用于其他产品和模型的综合评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信