A Fair Deal? Justice in Dismissal in Australia

Marilyn J. Pittard
{"title":"A Fair Deal? Justice in Dismissal in Australia","authors":"Marilyn J. Pittard","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2022.2106677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the historical backdrop of some protection against unfair dismissal at State level, this article explores the chequered path to ‘a fair go all round’ in Federal unfair dismissal protection for employees in Australia, initially through awards (and the foundation laid by the federal industrial tribunal) in 1984 to legislative provisions enacted by the Federal Parliament in 1993. The vicissitudes of the Federal statutory unfair dismissal regime are scrutinised: first its virtual dismantling by a conservative government in 2005 and then its revival by a Labor government in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The article analyses the nature of the unfair dismissal jurisdiction legislatively conferred on the industrial tribunal, protecting employees against ‘harsh, unjust or unreasonable’ dismissal. It argues that, while there is no clamour by employers or unions for a major overhaul of the unfair dismissal laws, legislative reform is required to promote more vigorously a ‘fair deal’ for Australian workers, especially for currently excluded categories of workers (such as gig workers and dependent contractors), and to improve access to justice in dismissal.","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"24 1","pages":"248 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2022.2106677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the historical backdrop of some protection against unfair dismissal at State level, this article explores the chequered path to ‘a fair go all round’ in Federal unfair dismissal protection for employees in Australia, initially through awards (and the foundation laid by the federal industrial tribunal) in 1984 to legislative provisions enacted by the Federal Parliament in 1993. The vicissitudes of the Federal statutory unfair dismissal regime are scrutinised: first its virtual dismantling by a conservative government in 2005 and then its revival by a Labor government in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). The article analyses the nature of the unfair dismissal jurisdiction legislatively conferred on the industrial tribunal, protecting employees against ‘harsh, unjust or unreasonable’ dismissal. It argues that, while there is no clamour by employers or unions for a major overhaul of the unfair dismissal laws, legislative reform is required to promote more vigorously a ‘fair deal’ for Australian workers, especially for currently excluded categories of workers (such as gig workers and dependent contractors), and to improve access to justice in dismissal.
公平交易?澳大利亚的解雇司法
在州一级对不公平解雇的一些保护的历史背景下,本文探讨了澳大利亚联邦对雇员的不公平解雇保护的“公平全面”的曲折之路,最初是通过1984年的奖励(以及联邦工业法庭奠定的基础)到1993年联邦议会颁布的立法规定。本书仔细考察了联邦法定不公平解雇制度的变迁:先是在2005年被保守派政府实质上废除,然后在2009年《公平工作法案》(Cth)中被工党政府重新启用。本文分析了立法赋予工业法庭的不公平解雇管辖权的性质,以保护雇员免受“严厉、不公正或不合理”的解雇。它认为,虽然雇主或工会没有要求对不公平解雇法进行重大改革,但需要进行立法改革,以更有力地促进澳大利亚工人的“公平交易”,特别是目前被排除在外的工人类别(如零工工人和依赖承包商),并改善在解雇时诉诸司法的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信