Definition of Mesh Weight and Pore Size in Groin Hernia Repair: A Systematic Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Can Deniz Deveci, Stina Öberg, Jacob Rosenberg
{"title":"Definition of Mesh Weight and Pore Size in Groin Hernia Repair: A Systematic Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.","authors":"Can Deniz Deveci, Stina Öberg, Jacob Rosenberg","doi":"10.3389/jaws.2023.11179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Groin hernia literature often uses the terms light- and heavyweight and small or large pores to describe meshes. There is no universal definition of these terms, and the aim of this scoping review was to assess how mesh weight and pore sizes are defined in the groin hernia literature. <b>Methods:</b> In this systematic scoping review, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We included randomised controlled trials with adults undergoing groin hernia repair with the Lichtenstein or laparoscopic techniques using a flat permanent polypropylene or polyester mesh. Studies had to use the terms lightweight, mediumweight, or heavyweight to be included, and the outcome was to report how researchers defined these terms as well as pore sizes. <b>Results:</b> We included 48 studies with unique populations. The weight of lightweight meshes ranged from 28 to 60 g/m<sup>2</sup> with a median of 39 g/m<sup>2</sup>, and the pore size ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 mm with a median of 1.6 mm. The weight of heavyweight meshes ranged from 72 to 116 g/m<sup>2</sup> with a median of 88 g/m<sup>2</sup>, and the pore size ranged from 0.08 to 1.8 mm with a median of 1.0 mm. Only one mediumweight mesh was used weighing 55 g/m<sup>2</sup> with a pore size of 0.75 mm. <b>Conclusion:</b> There seems to be a consensus that meshes weighing less than 60 g/m<sup>2</sup> are defined as lightweight and meshes weighing more than 70 g/m<sup>2</sup> are defined as heavyweight. The weight terms were used independently of pore sizes, which slightly overlapped between lightweight and heavyweight meshes.</p>","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2023.11179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Groin hernia literature often uses the terms light- and heavyweight and small or large pores to describe meshes. There is no universal definition of these terms, and the aim of this scoping review was to assess how mesh weight and pore sizes are defined in the groin hernia literature. Methods: In this systematic scoping review, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL. We included randomised controlled trials with adults undergoing groin hernia repair with the Lichtenstein or laparoscopic techniques using a flat permanent polypropylene or polyester mesh. Studies had to use the terms lightweight, mediumweight, or heavyweight to be included, and the outcome was to report how researchers defined these terms as well as pore sizes. Results: We included 48 studies with unique populations. The weight of lightweight meshes ranged from 28 to 60 g/m2 with a median of 39 g/m2, and the pore size ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 mm with a median of 1.6 mm. The weight of heavyweight meshes ranged from 72 to 116 g/m2 with a median of 88 g/m2, and the pore size ranged from 0.08 to 1.8 mm with a median of 1.0 mm. Only one mediumweight mesh was used weighing 55 g/m2 with a pore size of 0.75 mm. Conclusion: There seems to be a consensus that meshes weighing less than 60 g/m2 are defined as lightweight and meshes weighing more than 70 g/m2 are defined as heavyweight. The weight terms were used independently of pore sizes, which slightly overlapped between lightweight and heavyweight meshes.

腹股沟疝修补术中网片重量和孔径的定义:随机对照试验的系统性范围界定综述。
简介:腹股沟疝文献经常使用轻量级和重量级以及小孔或大孔来描述网片。这些术语没有统一的定义,本次范围界定审查旨在评估腹股沟疝文献中如何定义网片重量和孔径大小。方法:在此次系统性范围审查中,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane CENTRAL。我们纳入了采用 Lichtenstein 或腹腔镜技术、使用扁平永久性聚丙烯或聚酯网片进行腹股沟疝修补术的成人随机对照试验。纳入的研究必须使用轻量级、中量级或重量级术语,研究结果必须报告研究人员如何定义这些术语以及孔径大小。结果:我们共纳入了 48 项研究,研究对象各不相同。轻型网片的重量从 28 克/平方米到 60 克/平方米不等,中位数为 39 克/平方米,孔径从 1.0 毫米到 4.0 毫米不等,中位数为 1.6 毫米。重型网的重量从 72 克/平方米到 116 克/平方米不等,中位数为 88 克/平方米,孔径从 0.08 毫米到 1.8 毫米不等,中位数为 1.0 毫米。只使用了一种中等重量的网片,重量为 55 克/平方米,孔径为 0.75 毫米。结论:重量小于 60 克/平方米的网眼被定义为轻量级网眼,重量大于 70 克/平方米的网眼被定义为重量级网眼,这一点似乎已达成共识。重量术语的使用与孔径大小无关,轻量级和重量级网格略有重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信